Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Autoregulation of Blood Flow01:17

Autoregulation of Blood Flow

Autoregulation mechanisms are characterized by their inherent capacity for self-regulation without necessitating specific nervous stimulation or endocrine control. These mechanisms facilitate the adjustment of blood flow and, therefore, perfusion specific to each tissue region. This self-regulation encompasses chemical signals and myogenic controls.
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrasonography demonstrates vagus nerve atrophy in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Response to correspondence: "Reappraising the neurovascular link between arterial stiffness and neuropathy: proposal for a neurovascular uncoupling index".

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same author

Prognostic value of plaque burden on computed tomography angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease.

European stroke journal·2026
Same author

Reply to: Utility in prognostication of continuous EEG monitoring in postanoxic coma: finding the right balance.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same author

Reply to: Utility in prognostication of continuous EEG monitoring in postanoxic coma: importance on timing in relation to the cardiac arrest.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same author

Carotid perivascular adipose tissue attenuation predicts stroke and TIA in symptomatic carotid artery disease patients.

Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression
11:26

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression

Published on: December 10, 2014

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation: different signal processing methods without influence on results and

Erik D Gommer1, Eri Shijaku, Werner H Mess

  • 1Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. e.gommer@mumc.nl

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
|November 5, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Reproducibility of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) measurements using transfer function analysis (TFA) and multimodal pressure flow analysis (MMPF) is poor. Methodological choices for signal processing did not significantly impact dCA parameter results.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in the Rat Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry
07:12

Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in the Rat Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry

Published on: January 19, 2020

Paired Cisterna Magna Nanoinjection and Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging Assay to Study Cerebral Blood Flow Regulation In Vivo
06:24

Paired Cisterna Magna Nanoinjection and Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging Assay to Study Cerebral Blood Flow Regulation In Vivo

Published on: July 8, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression
11:26

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression

Published on: December 10, 2014

Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in the Rat Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry
07:12

Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in the Rat Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry

Published on: January 19, 2020

Paired Cisterna Magna Nanoinjection and Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging Assay to Study Cerebral Blood Flow Regulation In Vivo
06:24

Paired Cisterna Magna Nanoinjection and Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging Assay to Study Cerebral Blood Flow Regulation In Vivo

Published on: July 8, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Physiology
  • Medical Engineering

Background:

  • Cerebral autoregulation is vital for maintaining stable cerebral blood flow despite fluctuations in cerebral perfusion pressure.
  • Standardized methods for measuring dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) are currently lacking, hindering consistent research and clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reproducibility of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) parameters using different methodological approaches.
  • To compare the reproducibility of transfer function analysis (TFA) with multimodal pressure flow analysis (MMPF).

Main Methods:

  • dCA parameters were assessed in 19 healthy volunteers across multiple measurement epochs (spontaneous and paced breathing) and sessions (morning and afternoon).
  • The study compared two raw data pre-processing techniques (mean subtraction vs. smoothness priors detrending) and two spectral density estimation methods (averaging vs. smoothing).
  • Reproducibility was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in dCA parameters were observed based on the chosen pre-processing or spectral estimation methods.
  • Both TFA and MMPF demonstrated poor reproducibility for gain and phase parameters.
  • Measurement timing (morning vs. afternoon) and breathing conditions (spontaneous vs. paced) did not influence reproducibility.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of signal-processing methods for dCA analysis appears to have minimal impact on the resulting parameters.
  • Current TFA and MMPF methods exhibit insufficient reproducibility for reliable dCA assessment.
  • Further research is needed to develop more robust and reproducible methods for measuring dynamic cerebral autoregulation.