Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments

Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments

Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments (EDMs) are essential tools in modern surveying, offering precise distance measurements by emitting electromagnetic signals and calculating the time required for these signals to travel to a target and return. Two primary types of signals are used in EDMs — light waves and microwaves — each suited to specific environmental and distance requirements. Light-wave-based EDMs utilize either infrared or laser light, providing high accuracy over short distances...

Doppler Effect - II

Doppler Effect - II

The Doppler effect has several practical, real-world applications. For instance, meteorologists use Doppler radars to interpret weather events based on the Doppler effect. Typically, a transmitter emits radio waves at a specific frequency toward the sky from a weather station. The radio waves bounce off the clouds and precipitation and travel back to the weather station. The radio frequency of the waves reflected back to the station appears to decrease if the clouds or precipitation are moving...

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Women's Fear and Risk Factors: Predicting Coercive Control From Police Domestic Violence Supplementary Forms.

Violence against women·2026

Same author

Psychometric Analysis of the <i>Perceptions of Sex Offenders</i> Scale: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Validity Correlates.

Journal of child sexual abuse·2026

Same author

The Sexual Self as a Function of Relationship Status in an Emerging Adult Sample.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Same author

Impact of Children's Presence on Police Responses to Domestic Violence Call Situations.

Child maltreatment·2022

Same author

Asking women survivors about thoughts or actions involving sex with children: an issue requiring therapist sensitivity.

Journal of child sexual abuse·2014

Same author

Do therapists' beliefs about sexual offending affect counseling practices with women?

Journal of child sexual abuse·2013

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

$Measuring Spray Droplet Size from Agricultural Nozzles Using Laser Diffraction$

Measuring Spray Droplet Size from Agricultural Nozzles Using Laser Diffraction

Published on: September 16, 2016

Comparative precision of distributed-backscatter Doppler lidars.

|November 12, 2010

Summary

Simple formulas for Doppler velocity estimators were derived and compared to fundamental limits. This work aids in evaluating experimental performance for direct-detection and heterodyne systems.

Area of Science:

Physics
Signal Processing
Optical Engineering

Background:

Doppler velocity estimation is crucial for various applications.
Existing methods for targets spread in range have limitations.
Understanding fundamental performance limits is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

Derive simple formulas for standard deviation in Doppler velocity estimators.
Contrast these formulas with Cramer-Rao bounds for different systems.
Provide a basis for evaluating experimental performance.

Main Methods:

Derivation of analytical formulas for standard deviation.
Application of frequency discriminators for direct-detection systems.
Comparison with Cramer-Rao bounds for direct-detection and heterodyne systems.

More Related Videos

Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management

Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management

Published on: September 12, 2017

Direct Comparison of Hyperspectral Stimulated Raman Scattering and Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy for Chemical Imaging

Direct Comparison of Hyperspectral Stimulated Raman Scattering and Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy for Chemical Imaging

Published on: April 28, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

$Measuring Spray Droplet Size from Agricultural Nozzles Using Laser Diffraction$

Measuring Spray Droplet Size from Agricultural Nozzles Using Laser Diffraction

Published on: September 16, 2016

Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management

Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management

Published on: September 12, 2017

Direct Comparison of Hyperspectral Stimulated Raman Scattering and Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy for Chemical Imaging

Direct Comparison of Hyperspectral Stimulated Raman Scattering and Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy for Chemical Imaging

Published on: April 28, 2022

Main Results:

Novel simple formulas for standard deviation were obtained.
Formulas allow direct comparison between direct-detection and heterodyne systems.
The derived formulas facilitate performance evaluation.

Conclusions:

The derived formulas offer a practical tool for analyzing Doppler velocity estimators.
This work clarifies performance trade-offs in different system configurations.
The findings support the optimization of experimental setups.