Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

07:36
Classical Short-Delay Eyeblink Conditioning in One-Year-Old Children
Published on: September 1, 2018
Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation
Hirokazu Tanaka1, Kazuhiro Homma, Hiroshi Imamizu
1National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NiCT), Hikaridai 2-2-2, Keihanna Science City, Kyoto 619-0288, Japan.
Experimental Brain Research
|November 16, 2010
Summary
Motor adaptation learning speed depends on physical timing, not subjective awareness. This research shows prism adaptation is processed in motor areas, unaffected by altered perceptions of event simultaneity.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Perception
Background:
- Motor adaptation relies on precise timing between actions and feedback to correct errors.
- Temporal delays in feedback, even as short as 50 ms, can significantly slow motor learning.
- Perception of simultaneity is adaptable, meaning subjective timing can shift independently of actual event timing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether prism adaptation is influenced by the physical timing of events or by the subjective perception of simultaneity.
- To determine if motor adaptation processes are sensitive to changes in perceived timing.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a pointing task with an introduced temporal delay in visual feedback to adapt their subjective simultaneity.
- Prism adaptation was then assessed under conditions with and without an additional temporal delay, while temporal adaptation was maintained.
- Learning speed during prism adaptation was measured and correlated with both physical and subjective timing parameters.
Main Results:
- Adaptation to a 100 ms temporal delay shifted subjective simultaneity judgments by 40 ms.
- Prism adaptation learning speed was significantly predicted by the physical timing of feedback.
- Learning speed was not predicted by the adapted subjective timing, indicating a dissociation between the two.
Conclusions:
- Prism adaptation is driven by the physical timing of sensory feedback, not by the conscious awareness of subjective simultaneity.
- Motor adaptation mechanisms appear to operate based on objective temporal relationships, independent of perceptual adjustments.
- These findings suggest that motor learning and adaptation may be processed in neural circuits, potentially primary motor areas, that maintain fidelity to physical temporal relations.
Related Concept Videos
Long-term Potentiation
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre- and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
Long-term Potentiation
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when presynaptic neurons...
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when presynaptic neurons...
Interference and Decay
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

