Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Ex Vivo Infection of Human Lymphoid Tissue and Female Genital Mucosa with Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 and Histoculture
Published on: October 12, 2018
HIV/AIDS and circumcision: lost in translation
1School of Law, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK. m.fox@law.keele.ac.uk
Insights
Male circumcision effectively reduces male HIV acquisition in heterosexual sex. However, promoting it widely is premature without further research on local feasibility and cultural acceptance.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- A 2009 Cochrane review found strong evidence for male circumcision reducing HIV acquisition in men.
- The review highlighted the need for research into implementation feasibility, desirability, and cost-effectiveness in local contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To emphasize the necessity of further research before widespread promotion of male circumcision for HIV prevention.
- To caution against overstating preliminary findings and marginalizing ethical concerns in the rush to address the HIV pandemic.
Main Methods:
- This paper synthesizes findings from a Cochrane review and discusses the implications of research translation.
- It highlights ethico-legal considerations and the importance of cultural sensitivity in policy formulation.
Main Results:
- Male circumcision is effective in reducing HIV acquisition in men engaging in heterosexual sex.
- Current evidence suggests it is premature to promote circumcision as a sole HIV prevention strategy due to a lack of context-specific implementation data.
Conclusions:
- Further research is crucial to assess the feasibility, desirability, and cost-effectiveness of male circumcision programs in diverse local settings.
- Scientific communication must be careful to avoid overstating findings and to address ethical and cultural considerations in HIV prevention policy.
Abstract:
In April 2009 a Cochrane review was published assessing the effectiveness of male circumcision in preventing acquisition of HIV. It concluded that there was strong evidence that male circumcision, performed in a medical setting, reduces the acquisition of HIV by men engaging in heterosexual sex. Yet, importantly, the review noted that further research was required to assess the feasibility, desirability and cost-effectiveness of implementation within local contexts. This paper endorses the need for such research and suggests that, in its absence, it is premature to promote circumcision as a reliable strategy for combating HIV. Since articles in leading medical journals as well as the popular press continue to do so, scientific researchers should think carefully about how their conclusions may be translated both to policy makers and to a more general audience. The importance of addressing ethico-legal concerns that such trials may raise is highlighted. The understandable haste to find a solution to the HIV pandemic means that the promise offered by preliminary and specific research studies may be overstated. This may mean that ethical concerns are marginalized. Such haste may also obscure the need to be attentive to local cultural sensitivities, which vary from one African region to another, in formulating policy concerning circumcision.
Related Concept Videos
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Amebiasis
Immunodeficiency Diseases
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency disorders...
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Genital Herpes
Cryptococcal Meningitis
