Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mind Everywhere: A Framework for Conceptualizing Goal-Directedness in Biology and Other Domains-Part One.

Biological theory·2026
Same author

Mind Everywhere: A Framework for Conceptualizing Goal-Directedness in Biology and Other Domains-Part Two.

Biological theory·2026
Same author

Assessing the Environmental Risks of Health Research Leads to Problematic Mission Creep for Ethics Committees.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Conflicts of Interest, Funding Support, and Author Affiliation in Peer-Reviewed Research on the Relationship between Climate Change and Geophysical Characteristics of Hurricanes.

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society·2026
Same author

The Vicious Spiral of AI Slop: Uncurated machine-generated content threatens research integrity and trust in science, ultimately harming all of us.

American scientist·2026
Same author

Transparent Journal Review of Dual Use Research of Concern.

Health security·2026
Same journal

Deferring to Expertise whilst Maintaining Autonomy.

Episteme (Edinburgh)·2026
Same journal

Scientific Networks on Data Landscapes: Question Difficulty, Epistemic Success, and Convergence.

Episteme (Edinburgh)·2014
Same journal

Scientific Autonomy and Public Oversight.

Episteme (Edinburgh)·2011
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Openness versus Secrecy in Scientific Research Abstract.

David B Resnik1

  • 1Bioethicist, National Institute of Environmental Sciences, National Institutes of Health. Dr. Resnik's research focuses on ethical issues in science and medicine.

Episteme (Edinburgh)
|October 1, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific research balances openness with necessary secrecy for intellectual property, privacy, and security. This article explores this conflict and offers solutions for navigating these competing interests in science.

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Science and Technology Studies
  • Research Ethics
  • Information Science

Background:

  • Openness is a core principle in scientific inquiry.
  • Secrecy in research is sometimes necessary for intellectual property, participant privacy, and national security.
  • Recent developments in technology, business, and politics intensify the tension between openness and secrecy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the conflict between scientific openness and secrecy.
  • To analyze how recent developments impact this balance.
  • To propose practical solutions for resolving these conflicts.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of scientific, technological, business, and political developments.
  • Analysis of ethical and practical considerations for research secrecy.
  • Case study approach (implied) to illustrate conflicts.

Main Results:

  • The article identifies key areas where openness and secrecy clash.
  • It highlights the growing complexity of balancing these principles due to external factors.
  • Practical suggestions for managing the tension are presented.

Conclusions:

  • Resolving the conflict between openness and secrecy requires careful consideration of specific contexts.
  • Effective strategies are needed to uphold scientific integrity while addressing legitimate needs for confidentiality.
  • Navigating this balance is crucial for the responsible advancement of science.