Related Experiment Videos
Compliance with Good Clinical Practice in oncology registration trials in Japan
K Yonemori1, A Hirakawa2, M Ando3
1Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital.
Background:
This study aimed to examine the quality in oncology registration trials for new drug application (NDA) or supplemental new drug application (sNDA) as extensions of the indications for use in Japan based on Good Clinical Practice (GCP) audit findings.
Materials And Methods:
We collected audit reports of on-site GCP inspections for registration trials in 383 NDAs or sNDAs that were reviewed by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency between the fiscal years 2004 and 2009.
Results:
Among the 40 audits for oncology drug applications, the frequencies at which one or more deficiencies ascribed to institution, investigator, sponsor, and institutional review board were found to be 15 (37.5%), 13 (32.5%), 21 (52.5%), and 10 (25.0%), respectively. The exclusion of patients from the review objective due to serious violations of GCP in 40 audits for oncology drug applications was observed in 2 (5.0%) cases, whereas that in the remaining 343 audits for other drug applications was observed in 40 (11.7%) cases.
Conclusion:
The overall compliance of GCP in oncology registration trials was moderately better than that in registration trials for other diseases, although there was no statistically significant difference between them.
Insights
Oncology drug trials in Japan showed moderate Good Clinical Practice (GCP) compliance, with fewer patient exclusions than other drug types. Overall quality in oncology registration trials was slightly better, though not statistically significant.
Area of Science:
- Clinical trial quality assurance
- Pharmaceutical regulatory affairs
- Oncology drug development
Background:
- Assessing Good Clinical Practice (GCP) quality in Japanese oncology drug registration trials.
- Focus on New Drug Application (NDA) and supplemental NDA (sNDA) submissions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate GCP compliance in oncology registration trials.
- To compare oncology trial quality against other therapeutic areas.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 383 audit reports from on-site GCP inspections.
- Data collected for NDAs/sNDAs reviewed by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (2004-2009).
Main Results:
- Deficiencies noted in 37.5% (institution), 32.5% (investigator), 52.5% (sponsor), and 25.0% (IRB) of 40 oncology audits.
- Patient exclusion due to serious GCP violations occurred in 5.0% of oncology trials versus 11.7% for other drug types.
Conclusions:
- Oncology registration trials demonstrated moderately better GCP compliance than trials for other diseases.
- No statistically significant difference in GCP compliance was found between oncology and non-oncology trials.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...