Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
Reliability of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment
Linda Forst1, Lee Friedman, Abraham Chukwu
1University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Forst-L@uic.edu
Background:
AMA's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment is used to rate loss of function and determine compensation and ability to work after injury or illness; however, there are few studies that evaluate reliability or construct validity.
Objectives:
To evaluate the reliability of the fifth and sixth editions for back injury; to determine best methods for further study.
Results:
Intra-class correlation coefficients within and between raters were relatively high. There was wider variability for individual cases. Impairment ratings were lower and correlated less well for the sixth edition, though confidence intervals overlapped.
Conclusions:
The sixth edition may not be an improvement over the fifth. A research agenda should include investigations of reliability and construct validity for different body sites and organ systems along the entire rating scale and among different categories of raters.
