Asthma education for older adults: results from the National Asthma Survey

Although asthma education is effective in younger population, it is unknown whether it is effective in older adults.

Using the Four-State National Asthma Survey (NAS) data, asthma control was compared between older adults (≥65 years) who had been taught to use a peak flow meter (PFM) and asthma action plan (AAP) with those who had not. We also compared older adults who had taken an asthma course with those who had not. Both short-term (symptoms within last 1 week, day and night symptoms in last 30 days, and the use of steroid in last 3 months) and long-term (asthma attack, emergency department visit, hospitalizations, and activity limitations in the prior year) outcomes were compared.

Three hundred and ninety-eight older adults with asthma were identified. There were no differences in the short- and long-term asthma outcomes between the older adults who had or had not received instruction on PFM or AAP use. In preliminary analysis, those who took AC were more likely to have at least one poorly controlled long-term outcome measure (81 vs. 65%, p = 0.034). However, this difference did not remain significant in a logistic regression analysis.

Engagement in asthma education course, instruction on action plans, and instruction on PFM use does not appear to affect asthma outcomes in older adults. Education specifically tailored toward older adults is required for better asthma control.