Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
On 'False, Collusive Objectification': Becoming Attuned to Self-Censorship, Performance and Interviewer Biases in
1Philip T. Yanos, PhD, is an Associate Professor. Kim Hopper, PhD, is a Research Scientist at the Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, and is a Professor of Clinical Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract:
In this paper, we discuss a problem in qualitative interviewing labeled by Bourdieu as 'false, collusive objectification'. As described by Bourdieu, interviews where this occurs appear authentic because they often echo social science concepts and terminology and therefore may please the interviewer; however, they are actually unusable. We evaluate Bourdieu's claim for the existence of 'false' interviews in light of the predominant postmodern position in qualitative research, offer examples from our own research on people diagnosed with mental illness and raise the issue of whether, when and how qualitative researchers should concern themselves with the shortcomings of interviews. We conclude with suggestions derived from Bourdieu's view on how to address the problem he described.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

