Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Malleability of time through progress bars and throbbers.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Diffusion modeling of interference and decay in auditory short-term memory.

Experimental brain research·2019
Same author

Overwriting and intrusion in short-term memory.

Memory & cognition·2015
Same author

A shared short-term memory system for stimulus duration and stimulus frequency.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2014
Same author

TMS-induced neural noise in sensory cortex interferes with short-term memory storage in prefrontal cortex.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2014
Same author

Does stimulus complexity determine whether working memory storage relies on prefrontal or sensory cortex?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Distractor frequency influences performance in vibrotactile working memory.

Tyler Bancroft1, Philip Servos

  • 1Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada.

Experimental Brain Research
|December 7, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Distractor stimuli interfere with working memory by overwriting stored information. Closer distractor frequencies to probe stimuli increase errors, supporting the feature-overwriting model of working memory interference.

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Working memory is crucial for cognitive tasks.
  • Interference is a key factor affecting working memory performance.
  • Feature overwriting is a proposed mechanism for working memory interference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of distractor stimuli on working memory.
  • To test the feature-overwriting hypothesis of working memory interference.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a vibrotactile-delayed match-to-sample paradigm.
  • Presented participants with target, distractor, and probe vibrotactile stimuli.
  • Manipulated distractor stimulus frequency relative to target and probe stimuli.

Main Results:

  • Distractor frequency significantly affected task performance.
  • Increased errors in same/different judgments occurred when distractor frequency was closer to the probe than the target.
  • Results support the feature-overwriting explanation for working memory interference.

Conclusions:

  • Distractor stimuli can degrade stored representations in working memory.
  • The proximity of distractor frequency to probe frequency influences the degree of interference.
  • Findings provide empirical support for the feature-overwriting model.