Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Distance Corrections

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Do adults make scale errors too? How function sometimes trumps size.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2014

Same author

Reasoning about artifacts at 24 months: the developing teleo-functional stance.

Cognition·2006

Same author

Young children's rapid learning about artifacts.

Developmental science·2005

Same author

Why things happen: teleological explanation in parent-child conversations.

Developmental psychology·2005

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Children's scale errors with tools.

Krista Casler¹, Angelica Eshleman, Kimberly Greene

¹Department of Psychology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604, USA. krista.casler@fandm.edu

Developmental Psychology

|December 15, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Children often make scale errors with miniature objects, even when using tools. This study reveals these errors stem from early purpose-based reasoning, not perceptual limitations, impacting object interaction.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Development
Child Psychology
Developmental Neuroscience

Background:

Children frequently exhibit scale errors, interacting with small object replicas as if they were full-sized.
Understanding the origins of these scale errors offers insights into children's object interaction and reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the role of instrumental tools in understanding children's scale errors.
To explore the connection between scale errors and children's purpose-guided reasoning.

Main Methods:

Study 1: Observed scale errors in 1.5- to 3.5-year-olds during free play with tools.
Study 2: Employed a forced-choice method with 2-year-olds to test goal achievement alternatives.
Study 3: Assessed perceptual maturity to rule out immaturity as a cause for scale errors.

Main Results:

Children made frequent scale errors with tools across different experimental conditions.
Scale errors persisted even when feasible alternatives for goal achievement were provided.
Results indicated that perceptual immaturity did not underlie the observed scale errors.

Conclusions:

Scale errors in children are significantly influenced by early-developing, purpose-based (teleofunctional) reasoning.
Object interaction and goal-directed behavior in young children are powerfully shaped by teleofunctional reasoning frameworks.