Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2026

Microfluidics in Assessing Platelet Function
Published on: November 8, 2024
Alternatives to clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: Prasugrel or ticagrelor?
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai1, Marzia Lotrionte, Fiorenzo Gaita
1Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Marzia Lotrionte, Fiorenzo Gaita, Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, San Giovanni Battista "Molinette" Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; Unit for Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Catholic University, 00136 Rome, Italy.
Insights
Clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor are antiplatelet agents used for acute coronary syndromes. This review evaluates their evidence, efficacy, and side effects to guide clinical choices.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Clopidogrel is a widely used antiplatelet medication for acute coronary syndromes and post-stenting.
- Its effectiveness is questioned due to variable patient response and newer agents like prasugrel and ticagrelor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence supporting clopidogrel's use.
- To compare clopidogrel with prasugrel and ticagrelor.
- To discuss the pros and cons of each antiplatelet agent.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of clinical studies and trials.
- Comparative analysis of antiplatelet efficacy and safety data.
- Synthesis of current evidence on clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor.
Main Results:
- Evidence for clopidogrel's efficacy is presented.
- Prasugrel's approval and role are discussed.
- Ticagrelor's future clinical application is considered.
Conclusions:
- A balanced view of clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor is provided.
- Arguments for and against each agent are outlined.
- Guidance for selecting appropriate antiplatelet therapy is offered.
Abstract:
Clopidogrel is a mainstay in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes or those receiving endovascular prostheses. However, its efficacy has been challenged in the recent past by studies suggesting variable individual responsiveness and by new, more potent competitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor. But what is the actual body of evidence in support of clopidogrel? Is there any dark side of the moon? What is the role of prasugrel, which has already been approved in Europe and in the United States? And what will be the future role of ticagrelor, when approved for routine clinical practice? We hereby concisely summarize the scope of this clinical choice, providing arguments in favor and against each of the three antiplatelet agents: clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
