Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Bootstrapping01:24

Bootstrapping

The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is small or...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lactate transport facilitates neurite outgrowth.

Bioscience reports·2018
Same author

Flexible dual-soliton manipulation for coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering spectroscopy.

Optics express·2018
Same author

A Tailored Multivariate Mixture Model for Detecting Proteins of Concordant Change Among Virulent Strains of <i>Clostridium Perfringens</i>.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2018
Same author

Development of High-Capacity Periodate Battery with Three-Dimensional-Printed Casing Accommodating Replaceable Flexible Electrodes.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2018
Same author

Frontal EEG Temporal and Spectral Dynamics Similarity Analysis between Propofol and Desflurane Induced Anesthesia Using Hilbert-Huang Transform.

BioMed research international·2018
Same author

Suppression of TLR4 activation by resveratrol is associated with STAT3 and Akt inhibition in oxidized low-density lipoprotein-activated platelets.

European journal of pharmacology·2018
Same journal

[Research progress on the impact of the digital information environment on the health of children and adolescents].

Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi·2026
Same journal

[Exploration and practice of ideological and political education integration in the "One Core, Two Integrations" curriculum model for epidemiology].

Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi·2026
Same journal

[Progress in research of visualization of ideology and politics elements in curriculum and its importance for <i>Epidemiology</i> curriculum].

Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi·2026
Same journal

[Operation of WeChat official accounts of <i>Chinese Journal of Epidemiology</i>].

Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi·2026
Same journal

[Study on the risk factors of development for mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease based on the competitive risk joint model].

Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi·2026
Same journal

[Mendelian randomization study on related factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus].

Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

[Bootstrap method-based estimation on the confidence interval for additive interaction in cohort studies].

Jin-ren Pan1, Kun Chen

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi = Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi
|December 18, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Estimating risk factor interactions in epidemiological studies is crucial. This research presents a method using Cox proportional hazard models to measure additive interaction, offering a more public-health relevant approach than multiplicative scales.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Context:

  • Interaction assessment is vital in etiological studies.
  • Logarithmic models like logistic or Cox proportional hazard models are common for estimating independent risk factor effects.
  • Current methods often estimate interactions on a multiplicative scale, which is less relevant for public health.

Purpose:

  • To illustrate a method for estimating additive interaction in cohort studies using Cox proportional hazard models.
  • To provide a more public-health relevant measure of interaction compared to multiplicative scales.
  • To demonstrate the utility of S-Plus with Bootstrap for estimating confidence intervals of additive interaction.

Summary:

  • This paper demonstrates estimating additive interaction using Cox proportional hazard models in a cohort study.
  • It applies Rothman's measures for additive interaction and utilizes S-Plus with Bootstrap for confidence interval estimation.
  • The proposed method offers improved precision and avoids exaggerated estimations often seen with odds ratios (ORs) in cohort studies.

Impact:

  • Provides a more accurate and public-health relevant assessment of risk factor interactions.
  • Offers a practical approach for researchers using readily available statistical software.
  • Aids in making more informed decisions in epidemiological analysis and public health interventions.