Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A review of cost-effectiveness analyses.

S Hurley1

  • 1Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria.

The Medical Journal of Australia
|August 6, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) helps compare healthcare programs, but results vary. Factors like age and treatment intensity significantly impact the cost-effectiveness of interventions for diseases like cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The ability of children and families with and without nut allergy to correctly identify nuts.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2023
Same author

Does point-of-care ultrasonography improve diagnostic accuracy in emergency department patients with undifferentiated hypotension? An international randomized controlled trial from the SHOC-ED investigators.

CJEM·2022
Same author

Effects of subzero saline chilling on broiler chilling efficiency, meat quality, and microbial safety.

Poultry science·2020
Same author

Sleep deficiency and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women in the California teachers study (CTS).

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2020
Same author

Reciprocal interactions between sodium appetite and need-free sugar intake.

Appetite·2020
Same author

Perceived age and perceived health among a Chinese cohort: Does it mean the same thing?

International journal of cosmetic science·2020

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Public Health Policy
  • Medical Decision Making

Background:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is increasingly used to evaluate healthcare interventions.
  • Numerous CEA studies have been published over the past 16 years.
  • CEA ratios (cost per year of life gained or quality-adjusted life year gained) aid in comparing program efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the application and interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses in healthcare.
  • To highlight the utility and limitations of CEA in resource allocation decisions.
  • To examine variations in cost-effectiveness for cardiovascular disease and cancer control programs.

Main Methods:

  • Review of published cost-effectiveness analyses over a 16-year period.
  • Analysis of cost-effectiveness ratios for various health interventions.
  • Identification of factors influencing cost-effectiveness estimates.

Main Results:

  • Preventive strategies for cardiovascular disease (e.g., smoking cessation, exercise) are often more cost-effective than treatments like antihypertensive therapy or bypass grafting.
  • Cholestyramine therapy for coronary heart disease prevention shows lower cost-effectiveness compared to other treatments.
  • Significant variations exist in the cost-effectiveness of interventions, influenced by patient age, treatment frequency, and specific health parameters.

Conclusions:

  • CEA is a valuable tool for assessing the relative costs and effectiveness of health programs.
  • Comparisons using CEA must be cautious due to inherent uncertainties in cost and effectiveness estimates.
  • Comprehensive policy-making and resource allocation often require considering factors beyond single CEA.

Related Experiment Videos