Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Comparison of root canal preparation using Flex Master Ni-Ti and Endo-Eze AET stainless steel instruments
Sabine Nordmeyer1, Véronique Schnell, Michael Hülsmann
1Department of Preventive Dentistry, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to compare various parameters of root canal preparation using FlexMaster rotary nickel-titanium and Endo-Eze AET stainless steel instruments.
Study Design:
Fifty curved mesial root canals of extracted mandibular molars were prepared to size 45 using FlexMaster or AET instruments. The following parameters were evaluated: straightening of root canal curvature, postoperative root canal cross-sections, cleaning ability, safety issues, and working time. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon test.
Results:
The mean degree of straightening was significantly less for FlexMaster than for AET (P = .001). Postoperative cross-sections showed no significant differences between the systems. Neither of the systems completely eliminated debris and smear layer. No procedural incidents occurred with the instruments. Mean working time was significantly shorter for FlexMaster than for AET (P = .0001).
Conclusions:
AET cannot be recommended for preparation of curved root canals, owing to unacceptable straightening.