Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
Making the investigational oncology pipeline more efficient and effective: are we headed in the right direction?
Patricia M LoRusso1, Aparna B Anderson, Scott A Boerner
1Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA. lorussop@karmanos.org
Abstract:
Advances in our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved in cancer biology have contributed to an increase in novel target-specific oncology therapeutics. Unfortunately, clinical development of new drugs is an expensive and slow process, and the patient and financial resources needed to study the vast number of potential therapies are limited, requiring novel approaches to clinical trial design and patient recruitment. In addition, traditional efficacy endpoints may not be adequate to fully determine the therapeutic worth of the new classes of targeted agents. In this new era of drug development, it has become increasingly clear that new clinical trial design paradigms that examine nontraditional endpoints have become necessary to assist in prioritizing the development of the most promising agents. It is also vital that individual patient management be considered, and the subpopulations of patients most likely to derive benefit or experience harm from a new therapy be identified as early as possible. Phase I and II clinical trials allow investigators doing clinical research the opportunity to define these critical endpoints and subpopulations early on, before conducting large-scale randomized phase III clinical trials, which require an abundance of financial and patient resources.
Insights
Novel oncology therapeutics require innovative clinical trial designs. Early-phase trials (Phase I and II) are crucial for defining endpoints and patient subpopulations to optimize drug development.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Advances in cancer biology have led to targeted oncology therapeutics.
- Clinical drug development is resource-intensive and time-consuming.
- Traditional efficacy endpoints may not fully capture the value of novel targeted agents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the necessity of novel clinical trial designs for targeted oncology therapeutics.
- To emphasize the importance of identifying patient subpopulations early in development.
- To underscore the role of early-phase trials in optimizing drug development pathways.
Main Methods:
- Review of current challenges in oncology drug development.
- Discussion of the limitations of traditional clinical trial endpoints.
- Emphasis on the strategic use of Phase I and II clinical trials.
Main Results:
- Novel clinical trial designs are essential for efficient drug development.
- Nontraditional endpoints and early subpopulation identification are critical.
- Phase I and II trials provide vital data for prioritizing promising agents.
Conclusions:
- Innovative clinical trial designs are necessary to navigate the complexities of targeted oncology drug development.
- Early identification of patient benefit and risk through Phase I/II trials is vital.
- Rethinking trial paradigms can accelerate the delivery of effective cancer therapies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Discovery: Overview
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview

