Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

07:29
A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
Published on: February 22, 2020
Generalized pairwise comparisons of prioritized outcomes in the two-sample problem
1International Drug Development Institute, 30 avenue provinciale, 1340 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. marc.buyse@iddi.com
Statistics in Medicine
|December 21, 2010
Summary
This study introduces generalized pairwise comparisons, extending the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for analyzing multiple outcomes. This method provides a
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Statistical Methods
- Nonparametric Statistics
Background:
- The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test is a standard nonparametric method for comparing two independent groups.
- Existing methods often focus on single outcome variables, limiting comprehensive analysis when multiple outcomes are present.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend the U-statistic concept for generalized pairwise comparisons between two groups.
- To introduce a general measure of group difference, the 'proportion in favor of treatment' (Δ).
- To demonstrate the utility of generalized pairwise comparisons in analyzing complex data from randomized clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Extension of the U-statistic for generalized pairwise comparisons.
- Application to single or multiple prioritized outcome variables of various types (discrete, continuous, time-to-event).
- Illustration using data from two randomized clinical trials.
Main Results:
- Generalized pairwise comparisons were shown to encompass well-known nonparametric tests.
- The method effectively analyzes data with multiple, prioritized outcomes.
- A general measure of group difference, Δ, was derived and related to traditional effect measures.
Conclusions:
- Generalized pairwise comparisons offer a flexible and powerful approach for analyzing differences between two groups, especially with multiple outcomes.
- The 'proportion in favor of treatment' (Δ) provides a valuable, interpretable measure of treatment effect.
- This methodology enhances the analysis of data from clinical trials and other comparative studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bonferroni Test
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Multiple Comparison Tests
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...

