Changes in running mechanics using conventional shoelace versus elastic shoe cover
Youlian Hong1, Lin Wang, Jing Xian Li
1Department of Sports Medicine, Chengdu Sports University, Chengdu, China.
Journal of Sports Sciences
|December 25, 2010
Summary
Shoelaces in running shoes enhance comfort and reduce pronation and plantar pressure compared to elastic-covered shoes. This improved foot-shoe fit may help prevent running injuries.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Medicine
- Footwear Technology
Background:
- Running shoes play a crucial role in athlete performance and injury prevention.
- Footwear design, including lacing systems, influences biomechanical parameters during running.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare perceived comfort, plantar pressure, and rearfoot motion between laced and elastic-covered running shoes.
- To evaluate the impact of shoelaces on foot-shoe fit and running biomechanics.
Main Methods:
- Fifteen male amateur runners participated in a comparative study.
- Participants tested both laced and elastic-covered running shoes during running.
- Perceived comfort, plantar pressure, and rearfoot motion were recorded for each shoe type.
Main Results:
- Elastic-covered shoes received lower comfort ratings (length, width, heel, cushioning).
- Elastic-covered shoes showed higher peak forefoot plantar pressure and greater rearfoot pronation.
- Laced shoes provided better foot-shoe fit, comfort, and reduced pronation/plantar pressure.
Conclusions:
- Shoelaces improve perceived comfort and foot-shoe fit in running shoes.
- Laced shoes demonstrate superior control over rearfoot motion and plantar pressure distribution.
- Utilizing shoelaces may contribute to preventing running-related injuries by optimizing biomechanical control.
