Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...

Purpose of Health Records I

Purpose of Health Records I

The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Supervised versus self-managed rehabilitation for patients with an acute first-time or recurrent patellar dislocation: the Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Post Patellar Dislocation (PRePPeD) external pilot randomized controlled trial and embedded qualitative study.

The bone & joint journal·2026

Same author

A National Core Community Palliative Care Medicines List for managing end-of-life symptoms.

Australian journal of general practice·2025

Same author

Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on the incidence of respiratory viruses in two British Antarctic Survey bases.

The Journal of infection·2024

Same author

Performing under Pressure: Insights into the Diagnostic Testing Burden at a UK National Health Service Clinical Virology Laboratory during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

Viruses·2022

Same author

Ca2+ imaging of self and other in medial prefrontal cortex during social dominance interactions in a tube test.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022

Same author

Editorial: Embracing neurodiversity in medicine

Australian journal of general practice·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Developing a framework for critiquing health research: an early evaluation.

Kay Caldwell¹, Lynne Henshaw, Georgina Taylor

¹School of Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University, The Archway Campus, Highgate Hill, London N19 5LW, UK. k.caldwell@mdx.ac.uk

Nurse Education Today

|December 28, 2010

Summary

This study introduces a unified framework for evaluating health research, simplifying the critique of both quantitative and qualitative studies for new researchers. It aids novice students in understanding diverse research methodologies.

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

Health research methodology
Nursing research evaluation
Scientific inquiry frameworks

Background:

Existing research critique frameworks are often specialized for quantitative or complex for qualitative studies.
Novice students in health and nursing fields require accessible tools for research appraisal.
A gap exists in unified frameworks catering to both quantitative and qualitative research evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a novel, integrated framework for critiquing health-related research.
To simplify the evaluation process for both quantitative and qualitative research designs.
To support novice students in understanding and applying research appraisal skills.

Main Methods:

Development of a single list of critical questions applicable to both research paradigms.
Focus on commonalities and differences in the research process across quantitative and qualitative approaches.
Framework designed for ease of use by students new to health research.

Main Results:

A consolidated framework that addresses both quantitative and qualitative research critique.
The framework simplifies the learning curve for novice students evaluating research.
Provides a balanced consideration of aspects unique to and shared by different research types.

Conclusions:

The new framework effectively supports novice students in critiquing diverse health research.
Integrating quantitative and qualitative critique enhances understanding of research methodologies.
This approach facilitates a more comprehensive and accessible research evaluation for early-career scholars.