Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

OMAMA-DB: the Oregon-Massachusetts Mammography Database.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026

Same author

Visual field inhomogeneities and the architectonics of early visual cortex shape visual working memory.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026

Same author

Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal cortex, unlike occipital stimulation, does not disrupt exogenous attention.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Distinct system-level computations underlie perceptual variation across the visual field.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Dynamic cortical routing mediates temporal attention.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Covert spatial attention is uniform across cardinal meridians despite differential adaptation.

Journal of vision·2026

Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Tracking without perceiving: a dissociation between eye movements and motion perception.

Miriam Spering¹, Marc Pomplun, Marisa Carrasco

¹Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY 10003, USA. spering@nyu.edu

Psychological Science

|December 30, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Even when visual stimuli are not consciously perceived, the brain processes motion for action. Eye movements tracked combined motion, while perception followed only one direction, revealing separate visual processing for action and awareness.

More Related Videos

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Loneliness Assuaged: Eye-Tracking an Audience Watching Barrage Videos

Loneliness Assuaged: Eye-Tracking an Audience Watching Barrage Videos

Published on: May 29, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Loneliness Assuaged: Eye-Tracking an Audience Watching Barrage Videos

Loneliness Assuaged: Eye-Tracking an Audience Watching Barrage Videos

Published on: May 29, 2020

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Psychology
Visual Perception

Background:

The relationship between conscious visual perception and automatic motor responses remains a key area of research.
Understanding how the brain processes visual information that does not reach conscious awareness is crucial for explaining complex behaviors.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the dissociation between visual motion processing for perception and motor action.
To determine if the brain can guide actions based on visual stimuli that are not consciously perceived.

Main Methods:

Comparing motion perception and reflexive eye movements in response to visual stimuli with reduced visibility.
Utilizing orthogonally drifting gratings presented to separate eyes, with monocular grating strength manipulated via adaptation.
Analyzing whether eye movements track pattern motion (vector average) or component motion (single direction).

Main Results:

Reflexive eye movements successfully tracked the pattern motion (vector average) of both gratings.
Perceptual responses exclusively followed one motion direction (component motion).
Observers rarely perceived the pattern motion, indicating a dissociation between perception and action.

Conclusions:

Visual motion processing for action is distinct from that for conscious perception.
The brain utilizes visual motion signals to guide eye movements even when these signals do not result in conscious awareness.
This dissociation highlights parallel processing pathways within the visual system.