Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-modal deep learning model for bipolar depression adolescents with verbal auditory hallucinations.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Management of Engraftment Arrhythmias Associated with Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Transplantation.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Metabotropic signaling downstream of GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors suppresses neuroinflammation in Parkinson's disease.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Effects of Flow Distributor Position and Loosener Configuration on Particle Flow Behavior in a Hydrogen-Based Direct Reduction Shaft Furnace.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Mechanistic study on nonylphenol-induced depressive-like behavior: PINK1/parkin-mediated mitophagy regulates synaptic remodeling in neurons" [Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 316 (2026) 120149].

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2026
Same author

Study on the effectiveness and accessibility of a CDR-based VTE quality control platform in county-level hospitals.

BMJ open quality·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Statistical efficiency in multiple-to-one comparison trials with optimal allocation ratio.

Jianliang Zhang1, Jenny J Zhang

  • 1MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA. zhangj@medimmune.com

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|December 31, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an optimal subject allocation ratio for multivalent vaccine trials comparing one vaccine to multiple comparators. This method enhances statistical efficiency and reduces sample size requirements for immunologic response assessments.

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Vaccinology
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Multivalent vaccines require rigorous comparison against multiple comparator vaccines.
  • Assessing immunologic responses in such trials presents statistical challenges.
  • Optimizing subject allocation is crucial for trial efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce an optimal subject allocation ratio for multiple-to-one comparison trials.
  • To enhance statistical efficiency and reduce sample size in vaccine trials.
  • To evaluate trial designs under various assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an optimal subject allocation ratio formula.
  • Statistical efficiency analysis comparing optimal vs. equal allocation.
  • Consideration of scenarios with equal/unequal effect sizes and variances.

Main Results:

  • The proposed optimal allocation ratio significantly increases statistical efficiency.
  • This leads to substantial savings in sample size compared to equal allocation.
  • Efficiency gains are demonstrated across different trial scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • An optimal subject allocation ratio is key for efficient multivalent vaccine trials.
  • This approach improves the statistical power and cost-effectiveness of comparative immunologic studies.
  • The findings support refined trial designs for vaccine development.