Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Data Reporting and Recording

Data Reporting and Recording

Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...

Nursing Assessment

Nursing Assessment

The two sources for collecting information are primary and secondary. After gathering information, interpretation and validation help to complete the data. The purpose of assessment is to establish data with the initial information, to interpret data about the patient's perceived needs and health problems, and to respond to these problems identified.
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments and...

Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report

Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report

An Incident or Occurrence Report in a healthcare setting is a crucial document used to record any unexpected occurrence that may or may not have affected a patient, employee, or visitor. Such reports are critical to improving patient safety and include all details leading up to and including the event.
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...

Data Collection III

Data Collection III

The physical assessment examines the patient for objective data that defines the patient's condition, and aids in formulating the nursing care plan. The purpose of physical assessment is a health status appraisal, which includes identifying health problems, and establishing a database for nursing intervention.
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...

Data Collection I

Data Collection I

Data collection gathers information needed to make accurate judgments about a patient's present condition. During a health history interview, subjective data is collected from the patient, their caregivers, or family members, and objective data is collected through observations and physical assessment. Patients are the primary source of subjective data. Thus information gathered from patients through interviews, observations, and physical examination is primary data. Secondary sources of data...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Achieving Meaningful Use and Operational Efficiency.

Journal of oncology practice·2018

Same author

Benchmarking Practice Operations: Results From a Survey of Office-Based Oncology Practices.

Journal of oncology practice·2018

Same author

National Oncology Practice Benchmark, 2011 Report on 2010 Data.

Journal of oncology practice·2018

Same author

The National Practice Benchmark for Oncology, 2013 Report on 2012 Data.

Journal of oncology practice·2018

Same author

The Oncology Ecosystem: Oncology Practice Trends From the National Practice Benchmark.

Journal of oncology practice·2018

Same author

A Snapshot of the State of Cancer Care in America.

Journal of oncology practice·2016

Same journal

The Promise of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapies to Improve Care and Outcomes in Patients With Cancer Who Have Chronic Hepatitis C Infection.

Journal of oncology practice·2019

Same journal

Oncologic Implications of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

Journal of oncology practice·2019

Same journal

Considerations for Long-Term Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer.

Journal of oncology practice·2019

Same journal

Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Risk in Patients With Cancer: A Primer for Oncologists.

Journal of oncology practice·2019

Same journal

Nationwide Survey of Patients' Perspectives Regarding Their Radiation and Multidisciplinary Cancer Treatment Experiences.

Journal of oncology practice·2019

Same journal

Management of Brain Metastases in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Journal of oncology practice·2019

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

National practice benchmark: 2010 report on 2009 data.

Elaine L Towle¹, Thomas R Barr

¹Oncology Metrics, a division of Altos Solutions, Los Altos, CA.

Journal of Oncology Practice

|January 4, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Oncology practices face economic challenges. Despite rising drug costs, practices improved efficiency and lowered expenses by adapting business processes, as shown by the National Practice Benchmark survey.

More Related Videos

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

Area of Science:

Health economics
Oncology practice management
Healthcare administration

Background:

Oncology practices are under significant economic pressure due to rising costs, increased patient volume, and stagnant reimbursement.
Practices are actively seeking strategies to improve efficiency and reduce operational expenses.
The National Practice Benchmark (NPB) provides crucial data for oncology practices navigating these financial challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the financial and operational trends in community oncology practices.
To assess practice efficiency and adaptation strategies in response to economic pressures.
To provide benchmark data for managing the contemporary oncology practice environment.

Main Methods:

An online benchmarking survey was distributed to community oncology practices nationwide.
Data from 189 practices across 44 states were collected for calendar year 2009 or the most recent fiscal year.
Financial and operational data from 2009 were compared with data from 2007 and 2008.

Main Results:

Total revenue in oncology practices increased by approximately 6% annually from 2007 to 2009.
Drug costs escalated significantly, with a 13.5% increase from 2007-2008 and 16% from 2008-2009.
Total practice expenses rose similarly to drug costs in 2008 but remained stable in 2009.

Conclusions:

Oncology practices are demonstrating increased service delivery efficiency.
Practices are adapting to the challenging economic environment by lowering overall expenses.
Despite rising drug costs, operational adjustments indicate successful adaptation within the oncology sector.