Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention
Published on: October 16, 2013
Comparative molecular field analysis to derive pharmacophore maps for induction doses of intravenous anaesthetic
1Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. john.sear@nda.ox.ac.uk
Background:
The present study examines the molecular basis of induction of anaesthesia by i.v. hypnotic agents using comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA).
Methods:
ED(50) induction doses for 14 i.v. anaesthetics in human subjects (expressed as molar dose per kilogram body weight) were obtained from the literature. Immobilizing potency data for the same 14 agents (expressed as the EC(50) plasma free drug concentrations that abolish movement in response to a noxious stimulus in 50% patients) were taken from our previous publication. These data were used to form CoMFA models for the two aspects of anaesthetic activity. Molecular alignment was achieved by field-fit minimization techniques. The lead structure for both models was eltanolone.
Results:
The final CoMFA model for the ED(50) induction dose was based on two latent variables, and explained 99.3% of the variance in observed activities. It showed good intrinsic predictability (cross-validated q(2)=0.849). The equivalent model for immobilizing activity was also based on two latent variables, with r(2)=0.988 and q(2)=0.852. Although there was a correlation between -log ED(50) and -log EC(50) (r(2)=0.779), comparison of the pharmacophore maps showed poor correlation for both electrostatic and steric regions when isocontours were constructed by linking lattice grid points, making the greatest 40% contributions; the relative contributions of electrostatic and steric interactions differing between the models (induction dose: 2.5:1; immobilizing activity 1.8:1).
Conclusions:
Comparison of two CoMFA activity models shows only small elements of commonality, suggesting that different molecular features may be responsible for these two properties of i.v. anaesthetics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers

