Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Michael Lipke1, Chandru P Sundaram

  • 1Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
|January 6, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metachronous contralateral recurrence in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional competing-risks analysis from the ROBUUST 3.0 registry.

Urology practice·2026
Same author

Real-world multicenter adherence to international guidelines in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: insights from the ROBUUST 2.0 Registry.

Minerva urology and nephrology·2026
Same author

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of extirpative surgery for upper tract urothelial cancer in octogenarians.

Urologic oncology·2026
Same author

Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the setting of clinical node positive disease: analysis of the ROBUUST registry.

World journal of urology·2025
Same author

Radical nephroureterectomy vs kidney sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in solitary kidney patients: a multi-institutional analysis of the ROBUUST 2.0 registry.

World journal of urology·2025
Same author

Strategies for Resolving Conflict Among Residents in Urology.

Current urology reports·2025
Same journal

Robotic reconstruction in genitourinary tuberculosis: Surmounting technical challenges.

Journal of minimal access surgery·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy for the treatment of large pheochromocytoma: A single-centre experience.

Journal of minimal access surgery·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for ventral hernia: A prospective analysis of peri-operative outcomes, functional recovery, and cost effectiveness.

Journal of minimal access surgery·2026
Same journal

Pyloric botulinum toxin injection and single-port laparoscopic intragastric surgery for bulbus hamartoma.

Journal of minimal access surgery·2026
Same journal

A new technical approach in sleeve gastrectomy: The SA-FAS (fundic anchor sleeve).

Journal of minimal access surgery·2026
Same journal

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the paediatric population: A quality-of-life study.

Journal of minimal access surgery·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offers a minimally invasive option for early prostate cancer. Outcomes show promising continence and potency rates, though positive margin rates vary by stage.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Prostate cancer is a leading diagnosis in men globally.
  • PSA screening has increased detection of early-stage, organ-confined prostate cancer.
  • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is an accepted surgical treatment option.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the surgical technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
  • To evaluate the oncologic and functional outcomes of this procedure.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current English-language literature on large series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
  • Analysis of reported positive margin rates, potency, and continence outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Positive margin rates varied significantly by pathological T stage (pT2a: 2.1-6.9%; pT2b: 9.9-20.6%; pT3a: 24.5-42.3%; pT3b: 22.6-54.5%).
Keywords:
laparoscopic prostatectomyprostate cancerradical

More Related Videos

Laparoscopic Radical Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Strategy and Technique Video
10:04

Laparoscopic Radical Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Strategy and Technique Video

Published on: June 6, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

Laparoscopic Radical Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Strategy and Technique Video
10:04

Laparoscopic Radical Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Surgical Strategy and Technique Video

Published on: June 6, 2020

  • Potency rates after bilateral nerve sparing procedures ranged from 47.1% to 67%.
  • Continence rates at 12 months post-surgery were between 83.6% and 92%.

    • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy demonstrates acceptable oncologic control and functional recovery for select prostate cancer patients.
    • Nerve-sparing techniques aim to preserve potency, with variable success.
    • High continence rates are achievable within a year of surgery.