Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Graphical Representation of Inequalities01:28

Graphical Representation of Inequalities

The graph of the equation where y equals x squared forms a curve known as a parabola. This curve acts as a boundary in the coordinate plane, dividing it into distinct regions based on the relative position of points.When the equality sign in the equation is replaced with an inequality—such as greater than, less than, greater than or equal to, or less than or equal to—the graphical representation changes from a single curve into a broader shaded area that signifies the set of all points...
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interspecific size regularities in tropical felid assemblages.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Visual textures, machine vision and animal camouflage.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

New light on forest shade.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

Whorled, wiled webs.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

A wavelet-based metric for visual texture discrimination with applications in evolutionary ecology.

Mathematical biosciences·1995
Same author

Hinged teeth.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1981

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Countershading: Universally deceptive or deceptively universal?

R A Kiltie1

  • 1Dept of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 326Il, USA.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|January 14, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Countershading, where animals have dark tops and light undersides, may not be primarily for camouflage from above. This study questions the common explanation, suggesting more research is needed for this animal coloration trait.

More Related Videos

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Zoology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • The common explanation for countershading (dark dorsa, light ventra) is camouflage via disruptive coloration under overhead light.
  • Direct evidence supporting this adaptive effect, particularly for terrestrial species, is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the prevalent hypothesis of countershading as a shape-obliteration mechanism.
  • To explore alternative explanations for the evolution of countershading.
  • To assess the applicability of countershading as an adaptive trait across different environments.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of existing research on animal coloration.
  • Examination of the definition and application of the term 'countershading'.
  • Comparative analysis of countershading's potential benefits in terrestrial versus aquatic environments.

Main Results:

  • The evidence for countershading as a primary camouflage strategy due to overhead illumination is weak.
  • The term 'countershade' has been applied inconsistently, leading to conceptual confusion.
  • Countershading is likely less advantageous for terrestrial animals compared to aquatic ones.

Conclusions:

  • The widely accepted explanation for countershading requires more empirical support.
  • Alternative evolutionary pressures on animal coloration patterns warrant further investigation.
  • Experimental studies are necessary to determine the true adaptive significance of countershading.