Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First crystallographic signature of amyloid-like fibril forming beta-sheet assemblage from a tripeptide with non-coded amino acids.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2002
Same author

Audit of stapedectomy results in a district general hospital.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2002
Same author

Coronary artery disease and its problems in management.

Journal of the Indian Medical Association·2002
Same author

Leucopenia in adult polycystic kidney disease patients on haemodialysis.

Nephron·2002
Same author

Traditional healers and their practices in Malawi.

Tropical doctor·2002
Same author

Enhanced frequency of micronuclei in individuals exposed to arsenic through drinking water in West Bengal, India.

Mutation research·2002
Same journal

Marital adjustment, psychological distress, and Internet addiction among married couples in an urban community: A cross-sectional study.

Industrial psychiatry journal·2026
Same journal

Neuropsychiatric presentation of Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome secondary to chronic alcohol dependence.

Industrial psychiatry journal·2026
Same journal

Theoretical underpinnings of flow and its relation with academic engagement: A narrative review.

Industrial psychiatry journal·2026
Same journal

Association of sleep quality and urinary melatonin levels with endometrial cancer: A case control pilot study.

Industrial psychiatry journal·2026
Same journal

Dengue: A cause for anxiety in endemic regions, a Thai experience.

Industrial psychiatry journal·2026
Same journal

Enhancing well-being and managing depression in alcohol dependence patients through well-being therapy.

Industrial psychiatry journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Probability, clinical decision making and hypothesis testing.

A Banerjee1, S L Jadhav, J S Bhawalkar

  • 1Department of Community Medicine, D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pune - 411018, India.

Industrial Psychiatry Journal
|January 15, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding P values is crucial for clinicians. This paper clarifies probability concepts beyond statistical significance, aiding clinical decisions and research interpretation.

Keywords:
Hypothesis testingP valueProbability

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Medical Decision Making

Background:

  • Many clinicians misunderstand the P value, often treating statistical significance as the definitive end of inquiry.
  • This misconception can lead to misinterpretation of research findings and flawed clinical decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the true meaning of probability as represented by the P value.
  • To provide a proper perspective on the P value's role in clinical practice and scientific investigation.
  • To differentiate between various types of probabilities relevant to medical research.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual explanation of probability and P values.
  • Discussion of the implications of P values in hypothesis testing.
  • Analysis of the role of probability in clinical decision-making.

Main Results:

  • The P value is often misinterpreted as a direct measure of truth or evidence.
  • A statistically significant P value marks the beginning, not the end, of critical evaluation.
  • Understanding different probabilities is essential for accurate research interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Clinicians need a deeper understanding of probability to correctly interpret P values.
  • Proper P value interpretation enhances the rigor of medical research and clinical decision-making.
  • This paper aims to reframe the understanding of P values within the scientific community.