Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER

ER is the primary site for the maturation and folding of soluble and transmembrane secretory proteins. The calnexin cycle is a specific chaperone system that folds and assesses the confirmation of N-glycosylated proteins before they can exit the ER lumen. The primary players of this quality check pipeline are the lectins, ER-resident chaperones, and a glucosyl transferase enzyme. In case the calnexin system in the lumen fails to salvage a misfolded protein, it is transported to the cytoplasm...

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain. Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...

Conserved Binding Sites

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection following induced vaginal delivery.

Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960)·2026

Same author

Copper Drives Remodeling of Metabolic State and Progression of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Cancer discovery·2024

Same author

Accelerating drug discovery and repurposing by combining transcriptional signature connectivity with docking.

Science advances·2024

Same author

Transcriptomic Analysis of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma and Differences in Male and Female Patients.

Cancer genomics & proteomics·2024

Same author

Specific binding sites on Rhesus rotavirus capsid protein dictate the method of endocytosis inducing the murine model of biliary atresia.

American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology·2024

Same author

Targeting MYC at the intersection between cancer metabolism and oncoimmunology.

Frontiers in immunology·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Fast geometric consensus approach for protein model quality assessment.

Rafal Adamczak¹, Jaroslaw Pillardy, Brinda K Vallat

¹Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, USA.

Journal of Computational Biology : a Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology

|January 20, 2011

Summary

A new method, 1D-Jury, rapidly ranks protein models using 1D profiles, outperforming computationally expensive 3D methods. This approach accelerates model quality assessment in protein structure prediction.

More Related Videos

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Area of Science:

Computational Biology
Structural Bioinformatics

Background:

Protein structure prediction generates multiple models requiring quality assessment.
Geometric consensus (GC) methods like 3D-Jury rank models based on substructure frequency but are computationally intensive.
Current GC methods require pairwise 3D superimposition for structural alignment, limiting scalability.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a computationally efficient alternative to 3D-Jury for model quality assessment.
To develop a method that avoids expensive 3D superimpositions for ranking protein models.
To assess the performance of a novel 1D profile-based approach for ranking protein structure models.

Main Methods:

Structural similarity assessment using 1D profiles (solvent accessibility, secondary structure).
Development of the 1D-Jury method for implicit comparison and ranking of N models.
Comparison of 1D-Jury performance against 3D-Jury and MaxSub heuristics.

Main Results:

1D-Jury achieves O(N) time complexity, significantly faster than quadratic methods.
1D-Jury avoids computationally expensive 3D superposition steps.
1D-Jury scores correlate strongly with MaxSub-based scores.
1D-Jury demonstrates comparable performance to existing GC methods in selecting top-ranked models.

Conclusions:

1D-Jury offers a fast and effective approach for model quality assessment in protein structure prediction.
The method shows potential for applications like rapid clustering of simulation-generated structures.
1D-Jury significantly reduces computational cost while maintaining high accuracy in model ranking.