Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Method of Joints: Problem Solving II

Method of Joints: Problem Solving II

Consider a truss structure with frictionless joints fixed to a wall and roller support. If a force of 150 N is applied to joint A, the forces in each member of the truss can be determined using the method of joints.

Maximum Deflection

Maximum Deflection

When analyzing beams under unsymmetrical loads, such as a train moving on a bridge, it is crucial to accurately determine the points of maximum stress and deflection. The process involves identifying the maximum deflection of the beam, which may not always occur at its midpoint due to the uneven distribution of the load.
The maximum deflection occurs at a specific point, known as point O, where the tangent to the deflection curve is horizontal. To find point O, the slope of the tangent at any...

Beams with Unsymmetric Loadings

Beams with Unsymmetric Loadings

Analyzing a supported beam under unsymmetrical loadings is essential in structural engineering to understand how beams respond to varied force distributions. This analysis involves calculating the deflection and identifying points where the slope of the beam is zero, which are crucial for ensuring structural stability and functionality.
The first moment-area theorem determines the slope at any point on the beam. This theorem indicates that the change in slope between two points on a beam...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Spot on: A Laser Micromachining-Based Approach to Improve Dried Matrix Spot Preparation with Proof-of-Principle Analytical Demonstrations Using Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry.

Micromachines·2026

Same author

Rapid Screening and Prioritization of Culture Conditions for Natural Product Discovery using the Liquid Microjunction Surface Sampling Probe.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry·2025

Same author

Development of Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional Graphical Entry-Point Maps for External Ventricular Drain Insertion.

World neurosurgery·2025

Same author

LMJSSP for analysis of prophylactic lubricants, spermicides and residues.

Talanta·2023

Same author

The Intercalated Segment: Does the Triquetrum Move in Synchrony With the Lunate?

The Journal of hand surgery·2021

Same author

Post-discharge after surgery Virtual Care with Remote Automated Monitoring-1 (PVC-RAM-1) technology versus standard care: randomised controlled trial.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2021

Same journal

The Influence of Different Starting Block Distances on Internal Tibial Load in Elite Sprinters.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026

Same journal

Altered Lower-Limb Dynamics in Stop-Jump Activity of Adolescents With Major Thoracic Scoliosis.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026

Same journal

Biomechanical Differences During Overground Walking in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Study With a Real Environment.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026

Same journal

The Influence of Relative Schoolbag Mass on Gait Biomechanics of South African Adolescents: The Role of Sex and Grade.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026

Same journal

Influence of Body Configuration on Kinetics and Multijoint Control Strategies Sprinters Use During the First Step Out of Blocks.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026

Same journal

Assessing the Validity of Whole-Body and Segmental Angular Momenta During Walking in Older Individuals With and Without Transtibial Limb Loss.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

Bone alignment using the iterative closest point algorithm.

Maarten Beek¹, Carolyn F Small, Randy E Ellis

¹Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Journal of Applied Biomechanics

|January 20, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Principal axes registration for carpal bones can lead to significant errors, especially in symmetrical bones. The iterative closest point algorithm offers superior accuracy for joint kinematics research and computer-assisted surgery.

More Related Videos

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images

Published on: February 23, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images

Published on: February 23, 2024

Area of Science:

Orthopedics
Biomechanical Engineering
Medical Imaging

Background:

Accurate registration of 3D bone models is crucial for computer-assisted surgery and joint kinematics.
Traditional methods like principal axes alignment can introduce errors in complex anatomical structures.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the accuracy of principal axes alignment and iterative closest point algorithms for carpal bone registration.
To identify potential limitations of principal axes registration in kinematic studies.

Main Methods:

Reconstruction of 3D bone surface models from imaging data.
Registration of carpal bone models using both principal axes alignment and iterative closest point (ICP) algorithms.
Quantification of registration errors for scaphoid and pisiform bones.

Main Results:

Principal axes method yielded errors of 0.35-0.49 mm (scaphoid) and 0.40-1.22 mm (pisiform).
Iterative closest point algorithm achieved errors below 0.4 mm.
Principal axes method showed higher inaccuracies in bones with greater symmetry.

Conclusions:

Principal axes registration is less accurate for carpal bones, particularly those with symmetrical features.
The iterative closest point algorithm provides higher accuracy for carpal bone registration.
Principal axes registration should be avoided for carpal bone kinematic studies.