Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
Published on: February 20, 2021
Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
N W Marshall1, A Mackenzie, I D Honey
1Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. nicholas.marshall@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
A new quality control protocol for digital radiography (DR) detectors was developed and tested. This protocol provides a quick, reproducible, and in-depth assessment of DR detector performance, showing superior imaging capabilities compared to traditional screen/film systems.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiological Imaging
- Quality Control
Background:
- Digital radiography (DR) systems are increasingly replacing traditional screen/film (S/F) technology.
- Standardized quality control (QC) protocols are essential for ensuring the reliable performance of DR detectors.
- The Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) is releasing a new report on DR QC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe and evaluate a new digital radiography (DR) quality control protocol for DR detectors.
- To assess the reproducibility and wider applicability of the developed protocol.
- To compare the imaging performance of DR detectors with conventional screen/film systems.
Main Methods:
- A protocol requiring twelve images with minimal spatial frequency processing was applied to multiple caesium iodide (CsI) DR detectors.
- Key performance metrics calculated include detector response, lag, modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS), and threshold contrast-detail (c-d) detectability.
- X-ray spectrum: 70 kVp with 1 mm Cu filtration; target detector air kerma: 2.5 µGy for NNPS and c-d.
Main Results:
- The protocol demonstrated good reproducibility with low coefficients of variation (cov) for MTF, air kerma, NNPS, and c-d detectability across identical detectors.
- Detective quantum efficiency (DQE) averaged 0.56 at 0.5 mm⁻¹ for CsI detectors from different manufacturers.
- DR detectors showed superior contrast-detail performance (average threshold contrast 0.46%) compared to S/F systems (0.70%).
Conclusions:
- The developed DR quality control protocol is quick, reproducible, and provides a comprehensive assessment of detector performance.
- The protocol facilitates in-depth evaluation for various digital x-ray detectors.
- The findings indicate superior imaging performance of modern DR detectors over traditional screen/film technology.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Crystal Structures
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
