Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026
An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
In vitro comparison of the pullout strength of 3 anterior double-screw fixation techniques with different screw
Sebastian Fuerderer1, Jan Vonhoegen, Oliver Coenen
1Department for Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen, Trier, Germany. sebastian.fuerderer@gmx.de
Object:
The pullout resistance of double-screw fixation systems in anterior spine surgery has been shown to be dependent on screw length as well as on screw angulation. The objective of the study was to evaluate the pullout strength of anterior double-screw systems with different angulations.
Methods:
The authors conducted a comparative pullout test of converging, parallel, and diverging angulations of double-screw systems in human cadavers. Twenty-four human vertebral bodies from T-11 to L-1 were harvested from 8 donors, dissected from surrounding tissue, and matched to 3 different fixation groups. Three systems were tested: VentroFix, with near parallel screw direction; the Hopf Anterior Fixation System (HAFS), with converging screw angulation; and the ART anterior system, with diverging screw angulation.
Results:
The mean (± SD) pullout strength of the VentroFix system was 699 ± 214 N, whereas the HAFS resisted to 591 ± 372 N. The ART anterior system with diverging screws demonstrated a pullout resistance of 810 ± 273 N. There was no significant difference amongst the pullout forces of the 3 groups (p > 0.05). In the HAFS and the ART anterior group, a weak correlation of pullout strength and bone mineral density measured by quantitative CT was found (r = 0.59 and r = 0.62, respectively), whereas the pullout force of the VentroFix system was not correlated with bone mineral density (r = 0.33).
Conclusions:
The in vitro pullout resistance of anterior double-screw systems does not appear to depend on screw angulation.
