Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026
Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
[Primary laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testis
O A Castillo1, R Sánchez-Salas, F P Secin
1Departamento de Urología, Clínica Indisa, Santiago, Chile. octaviocastillo@vtr.net
Introduction:
this report is intended to retrospectively assess cancer control and morbidity of primary laparoscopic reproperitoneal lymphadenectomy (L-RPLND) in patients with clinical Stage I non seminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT).
Materials And Methods:
one hundred and sixty-four patients with clinical Stage I NSGCT underwent primary diagnostic LRPLND between 1993 and 2006. Patients were operated unilaterally limiting the dissection to templates. Kaplan Meier curves were generated estimating time to recurrence.
Results:
of the 164 patients, 82 (48%) had embryonal components and 35 (20%) lymphovascular invasion in the orchiectomy specimen. The median (IQR) age, operative time, length of hospital stay, blood loss and number of lymph nodes retrieved was 28 years (24-33), 135 minutes. (120- 180), 48 hours (24-48), 50 cc (20-100) and 14 (10-18) nodes, respectively. All patients had negative serum markers preoperatively. Presence of lymph node metastasis was identified in 32 (19.5%) patients. Follow-up was available in 15 of these. Fourteen received adjuvant chemotherapy and 2 of them had recurrence at 3 and 64 months. Absence of lymph node metastasis was diagnosed in 132 (80.5%) patients. Follow-up was available in 80 of these. Among them 7 recurred (5 retroperitoneum, 2 lung), one of them 33 months after L-RPLND. Median follow-up for patients without recurrence was 14 months (IQR:4-35). The cumulative 3-year recurrence free rate was 82% (95%CI: 64-91). Seventeen (10%) of 164 patients had intra or perioperative complications.
Conclusions:
this is the largest series of L-RPLND performed in a single institution. Both morbidity and oncologic safety of this technique needs to be prospectively evaluated in randomized trials.