Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

Overview
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

Overview
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.
Protein and Protein Structure02:15

Protein and Protein Structure

Proteins are one of the most abundant organic molecules in living systems and have the most diverse range of functions of all macromolecules. Proteins may be structural, regulatory, contractile, or protective. They may serve in transport, storage, or membranes; or they may be toxins or enzymes. Their structures, like their functions, vary greatly. They are all, however, amino acid polymers arranged in a linear sequence.
A protein's shape is critical to its function. For example, an enzyme can...
Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

Overview

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ARTEM server: an online tool for nucleic acid 3D motif searches, 3D structure superposition and structure-based alignment.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

The Nucleic Acids Circular Dichroism and Fourier Transform Databases NACDDB and NAIRDB: New Tools for RNA Structural Analysis.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

MODOMICS: a database of RNA modifications and related information. 2025 update and 20th anniversary.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Blind prediction of complex water and ion ensembles around RNA in CASP16.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Evaluation of single-template ligand-based methods for the discovery of small-molecule nucleic acid binders.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Blind Prediction of Complex Water and Ion Ensembles Around RNA in CASP16.

Proteins·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

RNA and protein 3D structure modeling: similarities and differences.

Kristian Rother1, Magdalena Rother, Michał Boniecki

  • 1Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, ul. Ks. Trojdena 4, 02-109, Warsaw, Poland.

Journal of Molecular Modeling
|January 25, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Computational RNA structure prediction is advancing, drawing parallels with protein modeling techniques. This review explores methods for predicting RNA 3D structures, adapting protein-like approaches while noting RNA-specific needs.

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Area of Science:

  • * Computational biology
  • * Structural bioinformatics
  • * Molecular modeling

Background:

  • * The function of ribonucleic acid (RNA) is intrinsically linked to its three-dimensional (3D) structure and dynamics, similar to proteins.
  • * Predicting RNA 3D structure from its linear sequence computationally remains a significant challenge, unlike the established methods for protein structure prediction.
  • * Existing computational tools for RNA structure prediction are limited, necessitating the exploration of novel methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To review and compare existing template-based and template-free computational approaches for macromolecular structure prediction.
  • * To specifically examine the applicability of
  • protein-like
  • modeling methods, successfully used for proteins, to RNA structure prediction.
  • * To identify commonalities and differences between protein and RNA structure modeling to guide future RNA-specific solutions.

Main Methods:

  • * Literature review of computational structure prediction methodologies for both proteins and RNA.
  • * Comparative analysis of template-based and template-free modeling strategies.
  • * Discussion of analogies and divergences between protein and RNA modeling paradigms.

Main Results:

  • * Significant analogies exist between successful protein structure modeling methods and emerging RNA modeling techniques.
  • *
  • Protein-like
  • computational methodologies show promise for predicting RNA 3D structures.
  • * Key differences between RNA and proteins necessitate the development of RNA-specific modeling adaptations.

Conclusions:

  • * RNA 3D structure prediction can benefit significantly from established
  • protein-like
  • computational modeling approaches.
  • * Further development is required to address RNA-unique characteristics within these modeling frameworks.
  • * This review provides a foundation for advancing computational RNA structure prediction through cross-disciplinary insights.