The politics of attention: gaze-cuing effects are moderated by political temperament
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
Published on: October 19, 2014
Michael D Dodd1, John R Hibbing, Kevin B Smith
1Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA. mdodd2@unl.edu
Abstract:
Gaze cues lead to reflexive shifts of attention even when those gaze cues do not predict target location. Although this general effect has been repeatedly demonstrated, not all individuals orient to gaze in an identical manner. For example, the magnitude of gaze-cuing effects have been reduced or eliminated in populations such as those scoring high on the Autism-Spectrum Quotient and in males relative to females (since males exhibit more autism-like traits). In the present study, we examined whether gaze cue effects would be moderated by political temperament, given that those on the political right tend to be more supportive of individualism--and less likely to be influenced by others--than those on the left. We found standard gaze-cuing effects across all subjects but systematic differences in these effects by political temperament. Liberals exhibited a very large gaze-cuing effect, whereas conservatives showed no such effect at various stimulus onset asynchronies.
More Related Videos
05:58Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals
First Impression
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Stereotype Content Model
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction