Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bacterial Outer Membrane Polysaccharide Export (OPX) Proteins Occupy Three Structural Classes with Selective β-Barrel Porin Requirements for Polymer Secretion.

Microbiology spectrum·2022
Same author

Performability evaluation, validation and optimization for the steam generation system of a coal-fired thermal power plant.

MethodsX·2022
Same author

A Comparative Study of Blood Loss With and Without Infusion of Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Replacement.

Cureus·2022
Same author

Reply to Oren et al., "New Phylum Names Harmonize Prokaryotic Nomenclature".

mBio·2022
Same author

Ecological variations in adult life table attributes of Aedes aegypti (L.) from the desert and coastal regions of India.

Medical and veterinary entomology·2022
Same author

Registration of polarimetric images for in vivo skin diagnostics.

Journal of biomedical optics·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
07:08

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

Higher order inference for the consensus mean in inter-laboratory studies.

Gaurav Sharma1, Thomas Mathew

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|January 25, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for estimating the common mean in inter-laboratory studies with varying variances. The modified signed log-likelihood ratio procedure provides accurate confidence intervals, particularly for small sample sizes.

More Related Videos

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
07:08

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Metrology

Background:

  • Inter-laboratory studies often involve measurements from multiple labs with differing variances.
  • A heteroscedastic one-way random model is commonly used for such scenarios.
  • Accurate estimation of the consensus mean is crucial for reliable scientific conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust interval estimation procedure for the common mean in heteroscedastic inter-laboratory studies.
  • To assess the accuracy and performance of the proposed method, especially with small sample sizes.
  • To provide a reliable statistical tool for combining results from different laboratories.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a modified signed log-likelihood ratio procedure.
  • Application of the procedure within a heteroscedastic one-way random model.
  • Simulation studies to evaluate confidence interval accuracy.

Main Results:

  • The proposed confidence interval procedure demonstrates satisfactory accuracy, particularly for small sample sizes.
  • Simulation results confirm the reliability of the method under varying within-laboratory variances.
  • The method effectively addresses challenges in combining data from multiple sources.

Conclusions:

  • The modified signed log-likelihood ratio procedure offers a reliable approach for interval estimation of the common mean in heteroscedastic inter-laboratory studies.
  • This method is particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes and differing laboratory precisions.
  • The approach provides a statistically sound basis for consensus mean determination.