Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026
08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Central processing uncertainty as a determinant of choice reaction time
G E Briggs1, A M Johnsen, D Shinar
1Psychology Department, New Mexico State University, Box 3452, 88003, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
Memory & Cognition
|January 29, 2011
Summary
Central processing uncertainty (Hc) was derived to quantify information hypotheses in cognitive tasks. This method applies to information reduction and conservation tasks, estimating repetition effects.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Information Theory
- Psychophysics
Background:
- The relationship between reaction time (RT) and information processing is a key area in cognitive psychology.
- Quantifying uncertainty in cognitive tasks is crucial for understanding decision-making processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive a method for calculating central processing uncertainty (Hc).
- To validate this method across different experimental designs, including information reduction and conservation tasks.
- To estimate stimulus and response repetition effects.
Main Methods:
- Developed a derivation procedure for central processing uncertainty (Hc) based on the information hypothesis RT=a+b (Hc).
- Employed Bayesian revision of stimulus probabilities following hypothesis testing failures.
- Applied the generalized procedure to data from single test stimuli in an information conservation task.
Main Results:
- Successfully derived a single-valued statement of central processing uncertainty (Hc).
- Demonstrated the applicability of the derived method across various test stimulus sets and probabilities in an information reduction task.
- Confirmed the generalization of the procedure to information conservation tasks.
- Quantified stimulus and response repetition effects.
Conclusions:
- Central processing uncertainty (Hc) provides a robust measure for information-based cognitive hypotheses.
- The derived method is versatile, applicable to both information reduction and conservation paradigms.
- Repetition effects can be effectively estimated within this framework.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Decision Making
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
01:37Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
01:28Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
01:15Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
01:25The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...