Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Residuals and Least-Squares Property01:11

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generating synthetic multi-national longitudinal cohorts for clinically grounded HIV research.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Use of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Among Children Living With HIV in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The Pediatric infectious disease journal·2026
Same author

Availability of Cancer Screening Across HIV Treatment Sites in the IeDEA Consortium.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Incidence and outcomes of childhood status epilepticus in Kano, northern Nigeria.

Epilepsia open·2026
Same author

Safety and tolerability of the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril among Nigerian adults with HIV: preliminary pilot data from a randomized clinical trial.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology·2026
Same author

Federated Learning Performance Depends on Site Variation in Global HIV Data Consortia.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Accounting for data errors discovered from an audit in multiple linear regression.

Bryan E Shepherd1, Chang Yu

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA. bryan.shepherd@vanderbilt.edu

Biometrics
|February 2, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Onsite data audits revealed discrepancies, introducing measurement errors in research. This study introduces statistical methods to correct for these errors, providing unbiased estimates and reliable confidence intervals for improved data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Data Management

Background:

  • Onsite audits identified significant discrepancies between site-recorded data and data reported to a coordinating center.
  • Such data discrepancies represent a measurement error problem, potentially biasing statistical analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present statistical methods for correcting data discrepancies identified through audits.
  • To provide unbiased estimates of associations and accurate confidence intervals in the presence of measurement errors.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical modeling to account for measurement error in predictors, outcomes, or both, including correlated errors.
  • Utilizing audit results (error rate and magnitude) from a subset of records to adjust analyses.
  • Extension of methods to multiple linear regression with site-specific error rates and magnitudes.

Main Results:

  • Developed methods to compute unbiased estimates of association and valid confidence intervals by incorporating audit data.
  • Demonstrated the impact of measurement error on naive estimates and the effectiveness of the proposed correction methods.
  • Validated the statistical methods through simulations and application to HIV patient data.

Conclusions:

  • Statistical methods incorporating audit findings can correct for measurement errors in clinical research data.
  • Accurate estimation of associations and reliable inference are achievable even with data discrepancies.
  • The proposed methods are applicable to complex regression models and can account for site-specific data quality issues.