Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

The Rigid Tube as an Alternative in Controlling the Problematic Airway
Published on: June 6, 2020
Evaluation of the Bullard, GlideScope, Viewmax, and Macintosh laryngoscopes using a cadaver model to simulate the
Jorge E Zamora1, Robert L Nolan, Sumit Sharan
1Department of Anesthesiology, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston Ontario, Canada. zamoraj@kgh.kari.net
Study Objective:
To assess the performance and cervical (C)-spine movement associated with laryngoscopy using the Bullard laryngoscope (BL), GlideScope videolaryngoscope (GVL), Viewmax, and Macintosh laryngoscopes during conditions of a) unrestricted and b) restricted C-spine and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility.
Design:
Prospective, controlled, randomized, crossover study.
Setting:
University teaching hospital.
Subjects:
21 cadavers with intact C-spine anatomy.
Interventions:
Each cadaver underwent to total of 8 intubation attempts to complete the intubation protocol using all four devices under unrestricted and restricted C-spine and TMJ mobility.
Measurements:
Laryngoscopic view was graded using the modified Cormack-Lehane system. Time to best laryngoscopic view and total time to intubation were recorded. C-spine movement was measured between McGregor's line and each vertebra from radiographs taken at baseline and at best laryngoscopic view.
Main Results:
During both intubating conditions, the BL achieved the highest number of modified Cormack-Lehane grade 1 and 2A laryngoscopic views as compared to the other three devices (P < 0.05) and had fewer intubation failures than the Viewmax or Macintosh laryngoscopes (P < 0.05). The GVL had superior laryngoscopic performance as compared to the Viewmax and Macintosh laryngoscopes (P < 0.05) and had fewer intubation failures than those two devices (P < 0.05). All devices except the Macintosh laryngoscope in restricted mobility achieved median times to intubation in less than 30 seconds. For both conditions, BL showed the least total absolute movement between Occiput/C1 and C3/C4 of all the devices (all P < 0.05). Most of the difference was seen at C1/C2.
Conclusions:
In cadavers with unrestricted and restricted C-spine mobility, the BL provided superior laryngoscopic views, comparable intubating times, and less C-spine movement than the GVL, Viewmax, or Macintosh laryngoscopes.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway
After assembling the equipment, the nurse should practice hand hygiene and don appropriate PPE according to infection control guidelines to avoid the...
Endoscopic Studies I: Bronchoscopy and Thoracoscopy
Bronchoscopy
Description
Bronchoscopy is a procedure that involves direct visualization of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A flexible fiber optic or rigid bronchoscope is used to carry out the procedure. The fiber-optic bronchoscope is more frequently used due to...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...

