Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Internal domain generality for ensemble perception of average orientation: Comparing and integrating information from multiple stimulus categories.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Selective removal of visual working memory items at test.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Selective removal of visual working memory items at test.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A single perceptual comparison is sufficient, but not necessary, to induce lasting memory distortion.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Memory Reactivation Levels Remain Unaffected by Anticipated Interference.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Association between pressure ulcers and phase angle in older adults residing in long-term care facilities.

Annals of geriatric medicine and research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture.

Keisuke Fukuda1, Edward K Vogel

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA.

Psychological Science
|February 12, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Individuals with lower working memory capacity disengage from distractors more slowly than those with high capacity. This research reveals that attentional control issues in low-capacity individuals stem from delayed recovery from distraction.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Working memory capacity is crucial for cognitive task performance.
  • Attentional control is linked to working memory capacity, with debates on capture susceptibility versus recovery speed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether low-capacity individuals are more susceptible to attentional capture or recover more slowly from it.
  • To differentiate between initial capture effects and recovery dynamics in relation to working memory capacity.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized psychophysical and electrophysiological methods to measure recovery time from attentional capture.
  • Conducted two experiments comparing high- and low-working memory capacity individuals.

Main Results:

  • Both high- and low-capacity individuals exhibited similar initial attentional capture effects.
  • Low-capacity individuals demonstrated significantly longer recovery times from attentional capture compared to high-capacity individuals.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the hypothesis that slow disengagement from distractors underlies the attentional control deficits in low-working memory capacity.
  • Working memory capacity differences may be characterized by varying speeds of recovery from attentional capture, rather than initial susceptibility.