Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...

What are Estimates?

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates.
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Assessing Tuning Parameter Selection Variability in Penalized Regression.

Technometrics : a journal of statistics for the physical, chemical, and engineering sciences·2019

Same author

Variable Selection in Kernel Regression Using Measurement Error Selection Likelihoods.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2018

Same author

Monte Carlo methods for nonparametric regression with heteroscedastic measurement error.

Biometrics·2017

Same author

Interactive Q-learning for Quantiles.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2017

Same author

iqLearn: Interactive Q-Learning in R.

Journal of statistical software·2016

Same author

Automatic structure recovery for additive models.

Biometrika·2015

Same journal

Gene-environment interaction analysis under the Cox model.

Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics·2025

Same journal

Matrix completion under complex survey sampling.

Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics·2023

Same journal

Generation of all randomizations using circuits.

Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics·2023

Same journal

Nonparametric tests for multistate processes with clustered data.

Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics·2022

Same journal

Semiparametric modelling of two-component mixtures with stochastic dominance.

Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics·2022

Same journal

Weighted Estimating Equations for Additive Hazards Models with Missing Covariates.

Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics·2019

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

Density Estimation with Replicate Heteroscedastic Measurements.

Julie McIntyre¹, Leonard A Stefanski

¹Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA.

Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics

|February 12, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new deconvolution estimator for density functions using replicate measurements with unknown error variances. The method improves upon existing techniques and is validated through simulations and real-world data analysis.

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Area of Science:

Statistical inference
Nonparametric statistics

Background:

Estimating probability density functions is crucial in statistical analysis.
Measurement errors with unknown variances complicate density estimation.
Existing deconvolution methods often assume known or homogeneous error variances.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a novel deconvolution estimator for density functions.
To address the challenge of unknown and heterogeneous measurement error variances.
To generalize existing kernel density estimators for improved accuracy.

Main Methods:

Developed a deconvolution estimator for density functions.
Incorporated estimation of unknown and heterogeneous error variances from replicate data.
Derived theoretical properties, including integrated mean squared error.
Generalized the Stefanski and Carroll (1990) deconvoluting kernel density estimator.

Main Results:

The proposed estimator generalizes existing methods.
Theoretical analysis provides insights into convergence rates.
Simulation studies demonstrate the estimator's finite-sample performance.
The estimator is successfully applied to real-world data.

Conclusions:

The novel deconvolution estimator effectively handles unknown and heterogeneous error variances.
The method offers a valuable tool for density estimation with noisy data.
The approach is robust and applicable to practical scenarios.