Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Point-of-Care Kidney and Genitourinary Ultrasound in Adults: Image Acquisition
Published on: June 21, 2024
Clinical outcomes in obese and normal-weight children undergoing ultrasound for suspected appendicitis
Christopher Sulowski1, Andrea S Doria, Jacob C Langer
1Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Obese children with suspected appendicitis had similar clinical outcomes to normal-weight children, but were more likely to need a CT scan. Current ultrasound screening practices are supported for this population.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Obesity Research
Background:
- Obesity is a predictor of nondiagnostic ultrasounds (US) for appendicitis.
- Ultrasound diagnostic accuracy is lower in obese children.
- Clinical outcomes in obese children with suspected appendicitis are not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare desirable outcomes in obese versus normal-weight children with suspected appendicitis.
- To analyze differences in clinical outcomes based on weight status.
Main Methods:
- Reanalysis of a prospective cohort study of 263 children (4-17 years) in a pediatric emergency department.
- Patients divided into obese (BMI-for-age ≥ 85th percentile) and normal-weight groups.
- Defined desirable outcomes for non-diagnostic US, including timely surgical intervention or ED discharge without CT scan.
Main Results:
- Obese children (n=76) had a lower desirable outcome rate (64.5%) compared to normal-weight children (n=187, 73.3%).
- Hospitalization, length of stay, return visits, surgery details, and complications were similar between groups.
- Obese children were significantly more likely to undergo a computed tomography (CT) scan (17.1% vs. 6.9%).
Conclusions:
- Obese children with suspected appendicitis have comparable clinical outcomes to normal-weight peers.
- Obesity is associated with a higher likelihood of CT scan utilization.
- Current practice of screening US followed by CT if needed is supported.
Background:
Obesity constitutes an independent predictor for a nondiagnostic screening ultrasound (US) in suspected appendicitis. Furthermore, the imaging route consisting of the screening US with a second US if necessary has a significantly lower diagnostic accuracy in the obese children (83%) than their lean counterparts (93%). However, the effect of this association on clinical outcomes in the obese population is unknown.
Objectives:
In children presenting to the emergency department (ED) undergoing US for suspected appendicitis, the objective was to examine if there is a significant difference in the proportions of those with a "desirable outcome" in the obese group versus their normal-weight counterparts.
Methods:
This was a reanalysis of a recent prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary care pediatric ED. A consecutive sample of 263 previously healthy children 4-17 years of age undergoing screening US for suspected appendicitis was enrolled. Study patients were divided into obese (body mass index-for-age percentiles [BMI-FAP] ≥ 85%) and normal-weight groups. The main outcome was the proportion of children with the desirable outcome in the obese and normal-weight groups. Desirable outcomes for patients with a nondiagnostic screening US were defined as either 1) nonperforated appendicitis or alternate surgical diagnosis undergoing appropriate surgical procedure within 24 hours of assessment without a computed tomography (CT) scan or 2) no appendicitis, discharged from the ED within 24 hours without a CT scan. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization, CT imaging for any reason within 30 days of initial presentation, length of hospital stay, return visits, time to and length of surgery, and complications.
Results:
Of the 263 patients, 76 (28.9%) were obese, and 187 had a normal weight. Ninety-nine children (37.6%) had appendicitis (obese = 24, normal-weight = 75). The desirable outcome was achieved in 46 (64.5%) of the obese patients versus 137 (73.3%) of the normal-weight children (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference = -0.21 to 0.04). Compared to the normal-weight children, the obese children had similar hospitalization rates (44.7% vs. 45.5%), median length of hospital stay (20.5 hours vs. 23.0 hours), and return ED visit rates (11.8% vs. 9.1%). The median time to surgery (obese = 10.5 hours, normal-weight = 9.0 hours), complications (obese = 25%, normal-weight = 21.3%), perforations (obese = 33%, normal-weight = 31%), and length of surgery (obese 80 [±37] minutes, normal-weight 67 [±25] minutes) were also similar. The rate of CT within 30 days of initial presentation was higher in the obese compared to the normal-weight group (13/76 or 17.1% vs. 13/187 or 6.9%, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.23).
Conclusions:
Previously healthy obese children undergoing screening US for suspected appendicitis experienced comparable clinical outcomes to their normal-weight counterparts. However, they were three times more likely to receive a CT scan during their investigation. These results argue for continuing current practice of using the screening US in this population, followed by a CT if clinically warranted upon reexamination.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...
