Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
Antibiotic update for the surgeon
1Associate Professor of Surgery, Ucla School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract:
All too often, it seems that the utilization of antibiotics by surgeons for either prophylaxis or the treatment of established infections is shrouded in a combination of mysticism and marketing. What should be straight forward, frequently becomes confused by factors such as superstition, habit, recent interaction with an industry representative, and faulty information. The rational use of antibiotics is surprising simply, and is based on the fact that these agents are, quite simply, systemic chemotherapy against bacteria. Once delivered to the patient these agents act not only locally, but, more importantly, sistemically against susceptible microorganisms. This demands that the practitioner make an educated guess as to which bacteria are likely to be present, as well as use an agent that both safe and effective in that specific patient. The types and variety of bacteria present in a surgical infection, or likely to be present, can usually be deduced by the location and / or organ system involved. The safest and most effective agent to be used against those organisms is primarily a function of the specific hospital that the patient in, and whether the infection is hospital-acquired (nosocomial) or community-acquired. The susceptibility patterns for bacteria vary from community to community (as noted by local hospitals), as well as from hospital to hospital dependent on whether it is a community hospital or a tertiary referral center. It is illogical to assume that the same drug or drugs will be just as effective in one setting as in another, regardless of whether they are used for prophylaxis or an established infection.
Insights
Rational antibiotic use in surgery requires understanding bacteria, patient factors, and local resistance patterns. Effective antibiotic selection depends on the specific hospital and infection type (hospital- or community-acquired).
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Antibiotic use in surgery is often influenced by non-scientific factors like marketing and habit.
- Rational antibiotic selection should be based on scientific principles rather than superstition or anecdotal evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the principles of rational antibiotic utilization in surgical prophylaxis and infection treatment.
- To emphasize the importance of understanding bacterial susceptibility patterns in diverse healthcare settings.
Main Methods:
- The study employs a deductive approach, analyzing the principles of antibiotic chemotherapy against bacterial infections.
- It reviews factors influencing antibiotic efficacy, including bacterial identification, patient-specific considerations, and local antimicrobial resistance data.
Main Results:
- Antibiotics function as systemic chemotherapy against susceptible bacteria.
- Bacterial types in surgical infections can often be predicted by the affected anatomical site.
- Antibiotic effectiveness is contingent upon local bacterial susceptibility patterns, which vary geographically and between healthcare facilities.
Conclusions:
- Effective antibiotic therapy requires an educated assessment of likely pathogens and appropriate drug selection.
- Choosing the right antibiotic is dependent on the specific hospital environment and whether infections are hospital-acquired or community-acquired.
- Assuming universal antibiotic efficacy across different settings is illogical and potentially harmful.
Related Concept Videos
Antibiotic Selection
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence