Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026
Biaxial Basal Tone and Passive Testing of the Murine Reproductive System Using a Pressure Myograph
Published on: August 13, 2019
A comparative biomechanical analysis of term fetal membranes in human and domestic species
Ali Borazjani1, Benjamin C Weed, Sourav S Patnaik
1Tissue Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, TERC and CAVS, Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to biomechanically characterize and compare human, porcine, equine, and ovine fetal membranes.
Study Design:
Noncontact metrology was used for topographic analyses. Uniaxial tensile testing was performed to resolve specific biomechanical values. Puncture force and radial stresses were determined with biaxial puncture testing. Microstructure and surface tortuosity were analyzed histologically.
Results:
Equine and human membranes sustained larger magnitude loading, but ovine and porcine membranes exhibited stronger material properties. Biaxial puncture validated uniaxial results; human and equine groups accommodated the largest loads but lowest stresses. Equine membranes were mostly vascularized; tortuosity was highest in porcine membranes. Species' gestation length was correlated positively with membrane thickness.
Conclusion:
The anatomy of placentation and length of species gestation show distinct relationships to membrane biomechanics. Unlike other species, human fetal membranes do not compensate for structural weakness with a thicker membrane. This finding may explain the high incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes in humans.
