Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Untargeted Metabolomics from Biological Sources Using Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS)
Published on: May 20, 2013
Systematic evaluation of solid-phase microextraction coatings for untargeted metabolomic profiling of biological
Dajana Vuckovic1, Janusz Pawliszyn
1Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Canada, N2L 3G1.
Abstract:
In this study, we propose for the first time the use of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for untargeted metabolomic profiling of biological fluids. To achieve this goal, we first systematically evaluated 42 different SPME coatings for the extraction of 36 metabolites from different chemical classes and of widely varying polarities (log P range of -7.9 to 7.4) in order to identify SPME coatings which are the most suitable for metabolomic studies and to improve the extraction of polar metabolites over the existing commercial SPME devices. Three types of SPME coatings (mixed-mode coatings, polar-enhanced polystyrene-divinylbenzene, and phenylboronic acid) performed the best for simultaneous extraction of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic metabolites at physiological conditions, thus making them suitable for untargeted metabolomic profiling applications. A rapid and simple SPME method was then developed with single-use biocompatible mixed-mode coating for the metabolomic profiling of human plasma in combination with liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry on a benchtop Orbitrap system. This optimized SPME method was evaluated versus ultrafiltration and solvent precipitation in terms of metabolite coverage and method precision. SPME detected 1592-3320 features versus 2082-3245 features detected by solvent precipitation methods and 2093-2686 detected for ultrafiltration using the same pooled human plasma sample. Method precision of SPME ranged between 11% and 18% (expressed as median relative standard deviation (RSD) of n = 7 replicates) versus 8-19% for solvent precipitation and 20-22% for ultrafiltration. The results demonstrate that the proposed SPME methodology reduces ionization suppression, provides free concentration information for hydrophobic analytes which are not detected by ultrafiltration methods, and can improve metabolite coverage over existing methodologies.
More Related Videos
07:34Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS)
Published on: March 14, 2013
11:25Multi-step Preparation Technique to Recover Multiple Metabolite Compound Classes for In-depth and Informative Metabolomic Analysis
Published on: July 11, 2014