Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I

In healthcare, informed consent is a crucial process that involves thoroughly communicating medical treatment options to patients, including benefits, risks, potential side effects, and alternatives. This process enables patients to make well-informed decisions about their care, ensuring they understand the implications of their choices before consenting to or refusing treatment.
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Unrealized Potential of Cascade Testing.

JAMA network open·2026

Same author

Newborn Sequencing: The Promise and Perils.

Annual review of genomics and human genetics·2026

Same author

Treatment Options Offered to Infants with Single Ventricle Physiology and Genetic Aneuploidy: A Survey of US Pediatric Intensivists, Cardiologists, and Cardiothoracic Surgeons.

Pediatric cardiology·2026

Same author

Donor Hearts for Transplantation after Circulatory Death.

The New England journal of medicine·2025

Same author

Ethical Basis of the Pediatric Vaccine Encounter-Correcting the Record.

JAMA pediatrics·2025

Same author

Reasons Don't Move Goalposts.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Mapping Infant Immunity with Minimal Input: Integrative Single-Cell and Multiomic Profiling

Mapping Infant Immunity with Minimal Input: Integrative Single-Cell and Multiomic Profiling

Published on: April 3, 2026

Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening?

Lainie Friedman Ross¹

¹Department of Pediatrics, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, USA.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

|February 23, 2011

Summary

Newborn screening (NBS) in the US should be re-evaluated due to advances in testing and research ethics. A tiered consent process can balance parental autonomy with infant health, improving universal newborn screening practices.

More Related Videos

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Mapping Infant Immunity with Minimal Input: Integrative Single-Cell and Multiomic Profiling

Mapping Infant Immunity with Minimal Input: Integrative Single-Cell and Multiomic Profiling

Published on: April 3, 2026

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

Area of Science:

Public Health
Medical Ethics
Genetics

Background:

Universal newborn screening (NBS) is a mandatory public health program in the US.
Infants undergo heel stick tests for metabolic, endocrine, and hematological conditions shortly after birth.

Observation:

NBS practices have evolved with the adoption of hemoglobinopathy testing and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS).
These advancements identify carriers and conditions, some untreatable or of unknown clinical relevance.
Increased interest in using residual blood spots for research raises ethical considerations regarding consent.

Findings:

Mandatory NBS for hemoglobinopathies is questioned, as carrier testing typically requires consent.
The justification for mandatory screening diminishes for conditions not requiring emergent diagnosis and treatment.
Ethical research practices emphasize voluntary participant consent.

Implications:

Revising mandatory NBS with a tiered consent process is proposed.
This approach aims to balance parental autonomy with the promotion of children's health.
The study advocates for a more ethically considerate and flexible NBS policy.