Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Multimethod strategy for assessing program fidelity: the national evaluation of the revised G.R.E.A.T. program
Finn-Aage Esbensen1, Kristy N Matsuda, Terrance J Taylor
1Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA. esbensen@umsl.edu
The Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) program demonstrated high fidelity in its delivery, according to a comprehensive process evaluation. This ensures confidence in future findings on the program's effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Criminology
- Public Health
- Education
Background:
- The Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) program aims to prevent youth violence and gang involvement.
- Process evaluations are crucial for understanding program implementation and ensuring reliable outcome assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the implementation fidelity of the G.R.E.A.T. program.
- To assess the consistency and quality of G.R.E.A.T. program delivery by trained officers.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a multi-method approach including observations of training sessions and program delivery.
- Conducted surveys and interviews with G.R.E.A.T.-trained officers, supervisors, and school personnel.
- Performed on-site observations of G.R.E.A.T. program implementation in study locations.
Main Results:
- The study found a high level of program fidelity across all assessed components.
- Consistent delivery of the G.R.E.A.T. curriculum was observed.
- Positive feedback was gathered from officers, supervisors, and school staff regarding program implementation.
Conclusions:
- The G.R.E.A.T. program is implemented with high fidelity, supporting the validity of outcome evaluation results.
- The robust process evaluation provides a strong foundation for interpreting the effectiveness of the G.R.E.A.T. program.
- High fidelity suggests that observed outcomes are likely attributable to the program itself.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Reliability and Validity
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Titrimetric Methods: Types and Commonly Used Strategies
