Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Phylogeny01:28

Microbial Phylogeny

Understanding the evolutionary relationships among microorganisms is fundamental to microbial ecology and taxonomy. Phylogenetic trees are essential tools for inferring these relationships, relying primarily on comparative analyses of molecular sequences such as DNA, RNA, or proteins. In microbial studies, these trees typically depict the evolutionary paths of diverse bacterial and archaeal species by mapping genetic differences accumulated over time.Phylogenetic trees are composed of tips,...
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.The length of the branches can depict time or the relative amount of change among organisms. For instance, the branch length might indicate the number of amino acid changes in the sequence that underlies the...
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.The length of the branches can depict time or the relative amount of change among organisms. For instance, the branch length might indicate the number of amino acid changes in the sequence that underlies the...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Double-negative (CD27<sup>-</sup>IgD<sup>-</sup>) B cells are expanded in NSCLC and inversely correlate with affinity-matured B cell populations.

Journal of translational medicine·2018
Same author

Using logistic regression to improve the prognostic value of microarray gene expression data sets: application to early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and triple negative breast carcinoma.

BMC medical genomics·2014
Same author

Alisertib added to rituximab and vincristine is synthetic lethal and potentially curative in mice with aggressive DLBCL co-overexpressing MYC and BCL2.

PloS one·2014
Same author

In Vitro Assessment of the Inflammatory Breast Cancer Cell Line SUM 149: Discovery of 2 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the RNase L Gene.

Journal of Cancer·2013
Same author

Choosing a method for phylogenetic prediction.

CSH protocols·2011
Same author

Distance methods for phylogenetic prediction.

CSH protocols·2011
Same journal

Identification of positive GATEWAY expression clones when both the pENTRY and pDEST vectors contain the same marker for bacterial selection.

CSH protocols·2012
Same journal

Imaging protein interactions by FRET microscopy: cell preparation for FRET analysis.

CSH protocols·2012
Same journal

Imaging protein interactions by FRET microscopy: labeling proteins with fluorescent dyes.

CSH protocols·2012
Same journal

Bradford assay.

CSH protocols·2012
Same journal

Detection of ubiquitylated proteins in mammalian cells.

CSH protocols·2012
Same journal

Imaging of organelle membrane systems and membrane traffic in living cells.

CSH protocols·2012
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Maximum parsimony method for phylogenetic prediction.

David W Mount

    CSH Protocols
    |March 2, 2011
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Maximum parsimony phylogenetic analysis identifies evolutionary trees by minimizing evolutionary steps. This method, also known as minimum evolution, is best for similar sequences but limited to small datasets.

    More Related Videos

    Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
    08:57

    Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

    Published on: August 14, 2018

    Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
    07:49

    Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

    Published on: August 16, 2017

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

    A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
    12:00

    A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

    Published on: February 5, 2014

    Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
    08:57

    Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

    Published on: August 14, 2018

    Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
    07:49

    Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

    Published on: August 16, 2017

    Area of Science:

    • Evolutionary biology
    • Bioinformatics
    • Computational phylogenetics

    Background:

    • Phylogenetic trees infer evolutionary relationships between biological sequences.
    • Maximum parsimony is a method for constructing these trees.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explain the principles of maximum parsimony for phylogenetic tree prediction.
    • To highlight the requirements and limitations of this method.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizes multiple sequence alignment (MSA) to identify homologous positions.
    • Analyzes each aligned position to find trees minimizing evolutionary changes.
    • Aggregates results across all positions to identify the most parsimonious tree(s).

    Main Results:

    • Identifies evolutionary trees requiring the fewest evolutionary steps.
    • The method is sensitive to sequence similarity and dataset size.

    Conclusions:

    • Maximum parsimony provides a parsimonious approach to inferring evolutionary history.
    • Its effectiveness is highest with closely related sequences and small sample sizes.