Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7 Tesla
Published on: January 6, 2019
Brain MR imaging at ultra-low radiofrequency power
Subhendra N Sarkar1, David C Alsop, Ananth J Madhuranthakam
1Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA. ssarkar@bidmc.harvard.edu
This study demonstrates that brain scans can be performed using significantly lower radiofrequency energy than standard clinical methods, while maintaining high image quality. This advancement could improve safety for patients with implanted medical devices.
Area of Science:
- Medical imaging physics within brain magnetic resonance imaging
- Radiology safety protocols and radiofrequency power optimization
Background:
Current clinical imaging protocols often require high radiofrequency energy levels that pose risks for patients with metallic implants. No prior work had resolved how to minimize these energy levels while maintaining diagnostic image quality. That uncertainty drove researchers to investigate the lower limits of energy absorption in brain scans. It was already known that standard sequences frequently exceed safety thresholds for certain device populations. This gap motivated a shift toward optimizing sequences to reduce energy deposition during magnetic resonance procedures. Prior research has shown that high energy levels can lead to heating near implanted hardware. This study addresses the need for safer imaging alternatives in a clinical environment. The authors sought to determine if ultra-low energy protocols could match the performance of conventional techniques.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study is to explore the lower limits of energy absorption during brain scans. Researchers sought to achieve this without sacrificing the signal or contrast seen in standard imaging. This effort focuses on creating a viable method for patients who possess implanted medical devices. Such individuals often face restrictions due to the heating risks associated with high energy levels. The authors investigated whether three-dimensional sequences could replace traditional two-dimensional protocols at standard field strengths. They hypothesized that optimized acquisition parameters could significantly lower energy deposition while preserving diagnostic utility. This work addresses the urgent need for safer imaging options in modern clinical settings. The motivation stems from the desire to expand access to high-quality neuroimaging for all patient groups.
Main Methods:
The review approach involved a prospective study design approved by an institutional review board. Seven healthy volunteers participated after providing informed written consent for the imaging sessions. Investigators implemented three-dimensional sequences specifically optimized to lower energy deposition. These protocols included fast spin-echo, fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery, and spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state. The team performed corresponding two-dimensional clinical scans for direct performance comparisons. Quantitative assessment relied on calculating signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios for all acquired datasets. Researchers applied a statistical simulation technique to evaluate the precision of these image quality metrics. This systematic evaluation ensured that qualitative and quantitative findings were robust across all tested sequences.
Main Results:
The key findings from the literature show that energy absorption decreased by two orders of magnitude using the optimized three-dimensional approach. This reduction occurred while maintaining clinically acceptable image quality and scan durations. High-power two-dimensional sequences yielded slightly higher signal-to-noise ratios in specific T2-weighted images. Conversely, the three-dimensional technique produced higher signal-to-noise ratios for T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery images. The ultra-low energy method achieved superior contrast-to-noise ratios across all three sequences for most brain tissues. Minor to moderate differences existed between the two approaches regarding qualitative appearance and absolute signal values. These results indicate that the proposed method effectively preserves tissue contrast despite the substantial drop in energy. The data confirm that diagnostic performance remains stable under these significantly reduced power conditions.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that ultra-low energy protocols offer a viable alternative for clinical brain imaging. Their findings suggest that significant energy reductions are possible without compromising diagnostic utility. The study indicates that three-dimensional techniques outperform traditional two-dimensional methods in specific contrast metrics. These results imply that patient safety can be improved for those with metallic implants. The researchers note that image quality remains within acceptable clinical standards despite the drastic power decrease. This work demonstrates that energy absorption can be lowered by two orders of magnitude at standard field strengths. The authors conclude that these optimized sequences provide a robust framework for future clinical applications. This synthesis highlights the potential for safer, high-quality neuroimaging across diverse patient populations.
Frequently Asked Questions
The researchers propose that using three-dimensional fast spin-echo and gradient-recalled acquisition sequences allows for a two-order-of-magnitude reduction in energy absorption. This mechanism maintains diagnostic signal levels compared to standard two-dimensional clinical protocols.
The study utilizes three-dimensional fast spin-echo, fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery, and spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state sequences. These tools are optimized to minimize energy deposition while preserving necessary tissue contrast.
A 1.5 Tesla field strength is necessary to provide a consistent baseline for comparing the new ultra-low power sequences against established high-power clinical standards. This specific field strength ensures that the results remain applicable to common hospital hardware.
The researchers employed a Monte Carlo method to calculate absolute signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios. This statistical approach provides a quantitative basis for evaluating image quality differences between the low-power and high-power techniques.
The study measures absolute signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios across different brain tissues. These metrics reveal that the three-dimensional approach yields superior contrast-to-noise values compared to traditional two-dimensional clinical imaging.
The authors claim that these optimized sequences facilitate safer scanning for patients with implanted devices. They suggest that this approach effectively mitigates heating risks while maintaining the clinical utility of brain magnetic resonance imaging.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).
Atomic Nuclei: Magnetic Resonance

