Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reclosers and Fuses

Reclosers and Fuses

Automatic circuit reclosers enhance the protection of distribution circuits by interrupting and auto-reclosing an AC circuit according to a preset sequence. They effectively manage temporary faults on overhead distribution lines, often caused by tree limbs or wildlife, by briefly disrupting service to improve overall reliability. However, contact with reclosers or energized broken conductors on the ground can pose serious hazards.
A comprehensive protection scheme for radial distribution...

Power System Three-Phase Short Circuits

Power System Three-Phase Short Circuits

Determining the subtransient fault current in a power system involves representing transformers by their leakage reactances, transmission lines by their equivalent series reactances, and synchronous machines as constant voltage sources behind their subtransient reactances. In this analysis, certain elements are excluded, such as winding resistances, series resistances, shunt admittances, delta-Y phase shifts, armature resistance, saturation, saliency, non-rotating impedance loads, and small...

Circuit Terminology

Circuit Terminology

An electrical network is a system composed of interconnected elements, such as resistors, capacitors, inductors, and voltage or current sources. Unlike a circuit, an electrical network does not necessarily form a closed path. In other words, while all circuits can be considered networks due to their interconnected nature, not every network qualifies as a circuit.
A circuit, on the other hand, is also an interconnected system of electrical elements but must contain one or more closed paths.

Bus Impedance Matrix

Bus Impedance Matrix

Calculating subtransient fault currents for three-phase faults in an N-bus power system involves using the positive-sequence network. When a three-phase short circuit occurs at a specific bus, the analysis uses the superposition method to evaluate two separate circuits.
In the first circuit, all machine voltage sources are short-circuited, leaving only the prefault voltage source at the fault location. The positive-sequence bus impedance matrix can be determined by solving the nodal equations,...

Zones of Protection

Zones of Protection

In power systems, the entire setup is divided into protective zones to isolate faults and protect the rest of the network. These zones include generators, transformers, buses, transmission lines, distribution lines, and motors. Each zone can be visualized as a separate room in a house, with each room protected by its own circuit breaker.
Protective zones are defined by closed dashed lines, containing one or more components. A key characteristic of these zones is the strategic placement of...

Primary Distribution

Primary Distribution

Primary distribution systems deliver electrical power from substations to consumers through various voltage classes, with 15-kV class voltages being predominant among U.S. utilities. Older 2.5- and 5-kV classes are being replaced by 15-kV primaries, while higher 25- to 34.5-kV classes are used in high-density urban areas and rural regions with long feeders. Three-phase, four-wire multigrounded systems are widely employed for balanced power delivery, using the neutral wire as a grounding point.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Trade-Offs between Grid Connectivity and Operational Flexibility in Reducing the Cost and Carbon Footprint of Green Ammonia.

Environmental science & technology·2025

Same author

Considering distributive justice as a planning principle helps navigate a diversity of future energy infrastructure designs.

Nature communications·2025

Same author

Future Deployment and Flexibility of Distributed Energy Resources in the Distribution Grids of Switzerland.

Scientific data·2025

Same author

Policy-driven transformation of global solar PV supply chains and resulting impacts.

Nature communications·2025

Same author

Disparate power transmission performance reinforces Italian social inequities.

iScience·2025

Same author

Minimum-Regret Hydrogen and Carbon Supply Chains to Decarbonize European Industrial Hydrogen Demands.

Environmental science & technology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Component criticality in failure cascade processes of network systems.

Enrico Zio, Giovanni Sansavini

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis

|March 5, 2011

Summary

This study introduces new indicators to identify critical network components prone to cascading failures. These indicators are compared against traditional centrality measures to better understand failure propagation in complex systems.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Network Science
Systems Engineering
Reliability Engineering

Background:

Understanding component criticality is crucial for network resilience.
Cascading failures pose significant risks to network stability and functionality.
Existing centrality measures may not fully capture failure propagation dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate specific indicators for component criticality in cascading failure scenarios.
To compare the effectiveness of these new indicators against classical topological centrality measures.
To identify the most suitable indicators for characterizing cascade processes in realistic network systems.

Main Methods:

Analysis of three distinct cascading failure models with varied load distribution and triggering events.
Application of specific criticality indicators to a realistic-size network case study.
Comparative evaluation of developed indicators against established topological centrality metrics.

Main Results:

Identification of specific indicators that effectively characterize component criticality in cascading failures.
Demonstration that certain new indicators are more representative of cascade processes than traditional centrality measures.
Validation of the approach using a realistic network model.

Conclusions:

The proposed criticality indicators offer a more accurate assessment of component vulnerability to cascading failures.
These indicators can enhance the robustness and reliability of network systems.
Further research can refine these indicators for diverse network applications.