Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On the distinction between artifacts and information.

M L Braunstein1, J T Todd

  • 1Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine 92717.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risky choice: An examination of information acquisition behavior.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

The great power of steady misrepresentation: Behaviorism's presumed denial of instinct.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Subject selection.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

The history of behavior analysis: Some historiography and a bibliography.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Tempered with a harsh word: Harzem's review of modern perspectives on John B. Watson and classical behaviorism.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same author

Misconception and miseducation: Presentations of radical behaviorism in psychology textbooks.

The Behavior analyst·2012
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

This study challenges the claim that previous kinetic depth effect research was flawed. It argues that the proposed new method has similar limitations and suggests experimental design improvements for accurate 3D perception research.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The kinetic depth effect (KDE) is crucial for understanding 3D form perception from motion.
  • Previous KDE research has been critiqued for stimulus artifacts potentially confounding results.
  • Sperling et al. (1989) proposed a new task to overcome these artifact limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the claims made by Sperling et al. regarding stimulus artifacts in KDE research.
  • To analyze the limitations of the proposed new methodology for studying the kinetic depth effect.
  • To provide guidelines for experimental design to ensure accurate measurement of 3D visual perception.

Main Methods:

  • The study presents a theoretical counter-argument, not new empirical data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It re-examines the nature and impact of stimulus artifacts in KDE research.
  • It analyzes the methodological assumptions and potential pitfalls of the Sperling et al. task.

    • Main Results:

    • The critique suggests that stimulus artifacts are not as pervasive as implied by Sperling et al.
    • The proposed method by Sperling et al. may be subject to similar artifactual limitations.
    • Existing studies may be less contaminated than previously suggested.

    Conclusions:

    • The pervasive nature of artifacts in kinetic depth effect research is re-evaluated.
    • The limitations of Sperling et al.'s (1989) proposed task are highlighted.
    • Recommendations are made for designing experiments to avoid response strategy confounds in 3D perception studies.