Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The DNA Replication Fork01:02

The DNA Replication Fork

An organism’s genome needs to be duplicated in an efficient and error-free manner for its growth and survival. The replication fork is a Y-shaped active region where two strands of DNA are separated and replicated continuously. The coupling of DNA unzipping and complementary strand synthesis is a characteristic feature of a replication fork.   Organisms with small circular DNA, such as E. coli, often have a single origin of replication; therefore, they have only two replication forks, one in...
The DNA Replication Fork01:02

The DNA Replication Fork

An organism’s genome needs to be duplicated in an efficient and error-free manner for its growth and survival. The replication fork is a Y-shaped active region where two strands of DNA are separated and replicated continuously. The coupling of DNA unzipping and complementary strand synthesis is a characteristic feature of a replication fork.   Organisms with small circular DNA, such as E. coli, often have a single origin of replication; therefore, they have only two replication forks, one in...
F Distribution01:19

F Distribution

The F distribution was named after Sir Ronald Fisher, an English statistician. The F statistic is a ratio (a fraction) with two sets of degrees of freedom; one for the numerator and one for the denominator. The F distribution is derived from the Student's t distribution. The values of the F distribution are squares of the corresponding values of the t distribution. One-Way ANOVA expands the t test for comparing more than two groups. The scope of that derivation is beyond the level of this...
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
Underflow Gates01:30

Underflow Gates

Underflow gates are vital for controlling water flow in irrigation canals. The three main types of underflow gates — vertical, radial, and drum gates — serve different purposes while ensuring effective flow management. Vertical gates move up and down, generating a free-flowing water jet; radial gates pivot to regulate the flow; and drum gates rotate for precise adjustments. The flow through these gates is influenced by downstream conditions, resulting in free or drowned outflow.Free and Drowned...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

FST and genetic diversity in an island model with background selection.

PLoS genetics·2024
Same author

The genetic architecture of repeated local adaptation to climate in distantly related plants.

Nature ecology & evolution·2024
Same author

How useful are genomic data for predicting maladaptation to future climate?

Global change biology·2024
Same author

The evolution of genetic covariance and modularity as a result of multigenerational environmental fluctuation.

Evolution letters·2023
Same author

The WZA: A window-based method for characterizing genotype-environment associations.

Molecular ecology resources·2023
Same author

Using genome scans to identify genes used repeatedly for adaptation.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2023
Same journal

Differential Immune Responses Correlate With Chytridiomycosis Severity in Italian Crested Newts.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Demography and Environment Shapes Genetic Variation: Spatiotemporal Genetic Dynamics in Cyclic Voles at Low Latitudes.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Gut Microbiome-Metabolome Reconfiguration Associates With Phenotypic Plasticity of Daphnia Under Predation Risk.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Population Genomics Highlight the Vulnerability of Coral-Dwelling Gobies to Ecological Losses due to Climatic Disturbances.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Ancient Divergences of the Maritime Alpine Tree Larix lyallii (Pinaceae) Contrasts With Patterns in Other Pacific Northwest Coastal Disjuncts.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Ontogenetic Sequence of Differential Gene Expression in Predator-Induced Daphnia pulex.

Molecular ecology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2026

FIBS-enabled Noninvasive Metabolic Profiling
09:16

FIBS-enabled Noninvasive Metabolic Profiling

Published on: February 3, 2014

G'ST and D do not replace FST.

Michael C Whitlock1

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. whitlock@zoology.ubc.ca

Molecular Ecology
|March 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New genetic differentiation indices (G'(ST) and D) are ineffective for highly mutable markers like microsatellites. Standard indices like F(ST) and R(ST) are better for understanding population structure and mutation effects.

More Related Videos

A Customizable Protocol for String Assembly gRNA Cloning (STAgR)
10:00

A Customizable Protocol for String Assembly gRNA Cloning (STAgR)

Published on: December 26, 2018

Method for Labeling Transcripts in Individual Escherichia coli Cells for Single-molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Experiments
07:51

Method for Labeling Transcripts in Individual Escherichia coli Cells for Single-molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Experiments

Published on: December 21, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2026

FIBS-enabled Noninvasive Metabolic Profiling
09:16

FIBS-enabled Noninvasive Metabolic Profiling

Published on: February 3, 2014

A Customizable Protocol for String Assembly gRNA Cloning (STAgR)
10:00

A Customizable Protocol for String Assembly gRNA Cloning (STAgR)

Published on: December 26, 2018

Method for Labeling Transcripts in Individual Escherichia coli Cells for Single-molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Experiments
07:51

Method for Labeling Transcripts in Individual Escherichia coli Cells for Single-molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Experiments

Published on: December 21, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Population genetics
  • Molecular evolution
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genetic differentiation measures population structure.
  • High mutation rates (microsatellites) can bias traditional indices (G(ST), F(ST)).
  • New indices (G'(ST), D) were developed to address mutation rate effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of new genetic differentiation indices (G'(ST), D).
  • Compare new indices against traditional measures (F(ST), R(ST)) for highly mutable markers.
  • Determine the utility of these indices in reflecting population genetic processes.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical evaluation of population genetic indices.
  • Analysis of index behavior under varying mutation and migration rates.
  • Comparison of G(ST), F(ST), G'(ST), D, and R(ST) performance.

Main Results:

  • G'(ST) and D are heavily influenced by mutation rate.
  • These new indices are insensitive to other population genetic processes at high mutation rates.
  • D is locus-specific, limiting demographic inference, but can indicate mutation vs. migration balance.

Conclusions:

  • F(ST) remains a crucial summary of population structure.
  • R(ST) or similar mutation-aware measures are superior to G(ST), G'(ST), and D for highly mutable markers.
  • Markers with lower mutation rates generally offer clearer interpretation of population structure.